Betrayed whites to vote BNP

It looks like the BNP are finally starting to win the fight to win our country back as people all over the country are flocking to the BNP after Labour have betrayed them. People are sick of immigrants and asylum seekers being given housing before the people who have lived there all their life and have waited patiently in the housing queue.

No more should we put up with this. It is time we shouted NO MORE and sent Labour packing.

If immigrants and asylum seekers want a home they should be put at the back of the queue and wait like every other white family does.

Fight anti-white racism – Vote BNP.

Lets hope the BNP double or even triple the amount of council seats they have and show Labour that we won’t take it anymore.

The only bad thing about this news is that Labour will realise they can no longer trust the white vote and will rely on the black vote more and more which will mean that they will bring more and more immigrants in and make them citizens so they can cling to power.

War games target Iran

British officers took part in a US war game aimed at preparing for a possible invasion of Iran, despite repeated claims by the foreign secretary, Jack Straw, that a military strike against Iran is inconceivable.

Personally I think British troops are too overstretched to attack Iran and if we did we would be annihilated if it was a ground based war.

The hypocrisy of both America and Britain is astounding. Both America and Iran signed the Nuclear non-Proliferation Treaty. Ratification took place in both countries. That Treaty assures Iran has the right to develop nuclear power. Stopping Iran from developing nuclear power is a violation of the treaty.

It is Britain and America who are in the wrong. We have no right to be making the demands we are making especially when Iran are doing specifically what everyone allowed them to do.

Can't pay council tax with money

As council tax rises higher and higher it seems that the mentally ill are actually running things. A woman called is mounting a campaign against her council for refusing to accept council tax in money.

What kind of idiots won’t let people pay their council tax with money? Why should we have to pay any other way? Money is the currency and credit cards are yet to be officially classified as currency. This is disgraceful and I hope Jane wins.

You can read the letter/email sent to the Love England site here:

Hi, my daughter Jane is mounting a one woman campaign against the authorities refusing to accept cash payments for council tax and other payments. It is a matter of principle bearing in mind that all card transaction etc can be traced and big brother is trying to turn us into a cashless society.
In our area they have refused her cash and consequently she is facing Magistrates - today - in court.
In fact it is an illegal act to refuse cash which is the legal tender of the realm however she is placing her neck on the block over this. She has also just taken out litigation against Ken Livingstone in his
official capacity because they have refused to accept her cash to pay a fine on the congestion charge. They have threatened her with the bailiffs and all sorts of things. She is now counter-suing for malicious prosecution.

She has no fancy lawyers - she is acting for herself with the written law of the land in her hands to
present in her defence. Could anyone out there like to send a message of support to her.

Jane Sutherland

Blogs now enemy of EU

POPULAR video blogs will be subject to new European regulations if Brussels’s proposals to update television regulation are adopted by Europe’s member states.

The EU can’t seem to leave anything alone. Why can’t they just mind their own business for once? They seem to want to be in every aspect of our lives. What they want is complete tyranny.

Regulatory Reform Bill update

The government is to write new safeguards safeguards into a controversial bill giving ministers sweeping powers to change the law after Labour's chief whip in the Lords warned it would otherwise face defeat.

Good news I would have thought, after all it looks like the government might be listening to the people for once. However in the article it doesn’t tell us once what those safeguards will be so Labour will most likely do the most minor change possible which will end up on the news and people will think it’s a great victory.

Unless they have announced what the safeguards will be already I don’t expect it to be anything significant.

Blog of the month

The blog of the month for this month is A Tangled Web.

This blog gets 9 out of 10

Rapists not even getting jail time

The number of rapists given a caution and freed instead of facing jail has more than doubled in the past decade in England and Wales, figures show.

In 2004, 40 offenders were cautioned for rape - compared with 19 in 1994.

Most of those cautioned are thought to be either under-18s or older people who committed rape a long time ago.

The Home Office said it was committed to bringing more rapists to justice.

I don’t care when they did it or how old they were when they did it. They should be immediately hung or shot by a firing squad. At the very least they should face years in jail but our liberal government seems to think rape is nothing and would rather let rapists off with a slap on the wrist. How can we expect this government to be tough on crime when they aren’t even tough of the most serious crime?

This government has to be one of the most incompetent in the world. No other government would let rapists get away with a crime like this.

More useless aid heads to Africa

Gordon Brown today pledged that Britain would contribute £8.5 billion over the next decade to inject new impetus into a drive to provide free education to the world's poorest children by 2015.

Why should we have to pay for Africa’s problems? Wouldn’t that £8.5 billion be better spent on our crumbling NHS or our pension pot?

As I have already proven in previous posts aid DOES NOT help. It only makes matters worse. So while the intention is good the outcome will always be bad. Its time to do the right thing and leave them be. Yes it will many years, even decades for them to advance to the stage where we are at now but it will take a lot longer if we keep giving them aid.

The government: Filled with idiots

Tough government rules to prevent sham marriages discriminate against immigrants, the High Court has ruled.

Campaigners said the law was discriminatory because it effectively labelled some immigrants as fraudsters.

The rules, introduced in February 2005, mean people born outside the EU and some bordering European nations who have only six months' permission to be in the UK must seek special permission from the Home Office to marry, irrespective of the status of their partner.

The only exemption is for people who marry in the Church of England.

According to Home Office figures, sham marriages had been rising before the new law - and fell dramatically when it was introduced.

Even though I would love to lay the blame entirely on the stupid ass judge who deserves a bullet in the ass it seems like the government were purposely setting themselves up to be ruled against. What kind of idiot has an exemption to the rule especially when we have laws that stop discrimination? The government definitely set themselves up here.

We should immediately revoke the European Convention on Human Rights and instead have our own constitution that is for citizens only.

INSANITY!

Thousands of unemployed asylum seekers granted sanctuary elsewhere in the EU can move to Britain and claim free council housing.

A court ruling yesterday opened the door to any poor EU immigrant to travel here and demand a home.

It overturns a Government edict that local councils have no duty to help EU citizens who head to Britain, but do not bother to get a job.

Councils will now have to hand over the keys to a council house to jobless EU nationals with nowhere to live - even though they have never done a day's work in Britain.

Around 500,000 refugees are thought to have been granted nationality by our EU neighbours over the past decade. They then assume the rights of a person born in that country.

Whoever made this decision is an idiot. We already are over populated as it is and now another 500,000 potential newcomers can receive a council house for free. Asylum seekers can go to the front of the queue to. This is insanity.

GET OUT TONY!

NEARLY half the country's voters want Tony Blair out of Downing Street...NOW!

The exclusive poll reveals that 42 per cent of voters want him to quit immediately and that 57 per cent—nearly three in five—say he should certainly go within a year.

I agree. Send him packing. Personally I wish he would be assassinated but leaving within a year would be a fair compromise as long as he stayed out of British and European politics forever.

Kudos to the government on ID cards

People who opt out of having an identity card when they renew their passport will still have to pay the full £93 combined cost of both cards, the Home Office disclosed yesterday.

The decision is a setback to anti-ID card campaigners hoping to develop a boycott on the back of the last minute opt-out compromise which defused parliamentary opposition.

Even though I don’t want an ID card you have to admire the strategy of the government at getting it passed the lords. The government has made all compromises that the lords succeeded in getting completely useless.

Someone should kick the big eared fascist where it hurts.

More terror attacks to come

SPY chiefs have warned Tony Blair that the war in Iraq has made Britain the target of a terror campaign by Al-Qaeda that will last “for many years to come.”

A leaked top-secret memo from the Joint Intelligence Committee (JIC) says the war in Iraq has “exacerbated” the threat by radicalising British Muslims and attracting new recruits to anti-western terror attacks.

The four-page memo, entitled International Terrorism: Impact of Iraq, contradicts Blair’s public assurances by concluding that the invasion of Iraq has fomented a jihad or holy war against Britain.

It states: “It has reinforced the determination of terrorists who were already committed to attacking the West and motivated others who were not.”

Well, well what a surprise. Who besides our leader didn’t know that this would happen? It seems that he has put oil and American friendship before British lives and what’s more he knew he was doing that.

We can’t stop terrorism with this liberal “love all Muslims” government. We have to start being tough. First we have to get a government that has at least a tiny bit of credibility then tell the Muslims that any Muslim that commits a terror act will be cremated in pig fat. For Muslims touching pork or pigs is a sin and you will go to hell. Once a bomb goes off that terrorist if he isn’t already dead will get the death penalty and get cremated in pig fat. If they are dead the remains will be scooped up, put in a bag with a pig and then burnt. This should also be televised so Muslims get the message. It will only take one occasion of it happening and you won’t even see another one planned unless they don’t plan to die and think they can get away easily. Most will be too scared to even do that.

A constitution, Electoral and Lords reform

It has become clear that this country needs more freedom and more democracy. This is the only way that we can end the corruption of our leaders and once again become a great country.


Constitution
We are one of three of the only countries in the world that does not have a codified constitution, we are in league with New Zealand and that wonderful Israel. Therefore we need a constitution to stop our leaders abusing this country.

I will do what I think is needed making my own rules up and stealing them from other constitutions. Of course you will probably be able to see which ones are mine by the crappy wording but I can change that when I get my civil servants to work on it :)


1a. A citizens referenda, required in a free state must be given when atleast 60,000 petition the government for it.
1b. The financial tax bill of a failed citizens referenda must be levied on the people who petitioned the government for it.
1c. All referendums fall under 'citizens referenda' if they involve the whole country, whether all at the same time or during different time periods (eg 10th march in Scotland, 15 April rest of UK).
1d. All referenda campaigns (all choices-Yes and no) must be given equal funding and equal publicity must be given in all media outlets that publish information or opinion regarding the subject.
1e. All households of citizens eligible to vote must receive information from the government regarding the subject and have an adequate amount of time of atleast 8 days to read it.
1f. All future treaties will require a citizens referenda before it is signed.
1g. Britain cannot join any international groups without a citizens referenda. International groups that change their name are classed as a seperate international group and there must be a citizens referenda on membership.

2a. This constitution can only be changed through a citizens referendum requiring 50% of the votes to go in favour of the change and 40% of the adult citizens being in favour of it (40% of adult citizens in favour and only 50% of votes in favour would mean an 80% electoral turnout).
2b. This constitution is the supreme law of the UK and overrides all existing legislation that interferes with it.
2c. A Constitutional court which is the highest in the land will hear cases regarding the constitution. The job of the court is also to investigate changes to the constitution. If it is deemed that government officials - elected or none elected had been misleading the public they can publish a report saying that they have found evidence and have ruled that the officials had been misleading the public.
2d. Citizens can use deadly force against government officials that have been found to be misleading the public unless they admit they have been misleading the public, admit why they did it and hold another referendum which will be financed by the misleading government officials' financial assets. If the referendum goes in the opposite direction of what it had beforehand due to the misleading events of the government officials then they will be impeached.
2e. Judges of the constitutional court can have no political affiliation to any political party. They can also have no affiliation to any special interest group whose aims include changing the constitution or aims requiring implementing something that would require a change in constitution.
2f. Judges of the constitutional court can serve a maximum of 15 years in the constitutional court.
2g. There will be a minimum of 7 judges in the constitutional court.


3a. All legislative powers herein granted shall be vested in a the House of Parliament of the United Kingdom of Great Britain, which shall consist of the House of Commons and House of Lords.
3b. The House of Commons shall be composed of members chosen atleast every five years by the people of the many constituencies.
3c. No person shall be a Member of Parliament who is not of voting age and a citizen of the United Kingdom for atleast 10 years.
3d. Members of Parliament should also live in the UK.
3e. The House of Commons shall be the only legislative power to initiate legislation.
3f. The House of Lords shall be the only body to hear impeachment cases when sitting for that purpose. The most senior constitutional court judge will be classed as the chief justice and will preside.
3g. The minimum sentence for those found guilty in impeachment cases is 3 years and shall mean removal of office and banning the holding of any elected office for 10 years after the sentence is up.
3h. All legislation must be voted on by parliament and must not be amended after the vote without another vote.
3i. All members of parliament shall have one vote.


4a. Citizens can have absolute freedom of speech, opinion including debate, peaceful assembly and protest and to petition the government for redress of grievances. Parliament shall make no law abridging any freedom in the constitution.
4b. The right to start a political party with members from a particular background shall not be infringed.
4c. Private employers may hire employees on whatever criteria they see fit.

5. The right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed unless they have not served in the military.

6a. The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
6b. All citizens are equal before the law. Privileges based upon birth, sex, estate, class, or religion are excluded.

7a. No fines or forfeitures will be given without trial.
7b. Civilian Criminal trials shall not be given without a jury of a minimum of 9 who will decide the verdict.
7c. In all criminal trials the defendant shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the county and city wherein the crime shall have been committed, which county shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the assistance of counsel for his defense.
7d. During trials the prosecution shall have to prove that the defendant committed a crime.

8. Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United Kingdom, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.

9. The right of citizens of the United kingdom to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United kingdom on account of sex, ethnicity or race.

10a. In case of the removal of the Prime Minister from office or of his death or resignation, the Deputy Prime Minister shall become Prime Minister.
10b. In case of the removal of both the Deputy Prime Minister and Prime Minister the next in line in the Cabinet will become PM.
10c. In case of the entire cabinet losing their jobs the office of Prime Minister will be given to the highest military general unless so many government ministers lose their jobs that they are no longer the party with a majority.
10d. Within three months of a new Prime Minister being inaugurated after the death or expulsion of the last one there must be a general election.

11a. The Prime Minister can nominate all his cabinet from Parliament.
11b. There will be a maximum of 22 cabinet positions.

12a. The Church of England shall be the Established Church of Britain.
12b. The monarch shall be a member of the Church of England or an Atheist.


House of Lords

The House of Lords needs to be compatible with a modern democracy without destroying centuries of tradition and this is how we will do it:

1. The present Lords can stay including future hereditary peers.
2. There will be an elected element in the Lords which will be the amount of around 10% of the Commons which would be 65.
3. The 65 elected Lords will be the ones acting as a jury in impeachment cases and will decide the verdict but will not decide the sentence unless they are presiding over the case as Chief justice.
4. The elected Lords will serve a 3 year term.
5. Elected Lords will not be allowed to be part of any political party.
6. To run for election they must pay £5000 and will not get their deposit back.
7. Elected Lords must not receive funding from unions, political parties or members of political parties.
8. Lords will not be paid unless they are on official business (having a part in impeachment cases or being a member of a committee) or are elected.
9. Elected Lords will be required to serve on committees when asked. MPs will not serve on committees unless there is a shortage of willing lords
10. When the Parliament Act is used it will not immediately send legislation through but it will stop all lords from voting on it. Only the elected lords can vote on it.
11. All elected lords that have legal experience will be required to serve on the constitutional court. If there isn't enough with legal experience they will be taken from the Lords who will serve until there is an elected lord with the required experience.


Electoral reform

The voting system would be changed to something like STV but it would be slightly different.

On the voting slip in each constituency there will also be an option of 'None of the above'. If this is voted for most then another vote will be called a month later and the people who were running for the election in that constituency will be banned in that constituency from running for the election and the parties will have to choose someone else.

At present 66% of MPs fail to gain 50% of the vote in their constituency. This is a problem.

In the new electoral system there will be more than one round of voting if no candidate receives atleast 50% of the vote. If that happens then the 2 most voted for candidates will go into another round 1 week later. If the 'None of the above' option is voted for atleast 10% of the time then that will also go into the second round.

The percentage of the vote the winning party gets in the first round will be important. Their percentage of the vote in the first round will then be doubled and thats the amount of their manifesto they can bring in. The rest must be voted on through a citizens referenda. This would mean the manifesto would be a contract and they won't be allowed to bring in anything that wasn't in their manifesto unless it is an issue of national security.

General election coming this year?

Sleaze and deceit will hasten Blair's exit. Now expect a surprise general election in the autumn.

IN BRITAIN, the Prime Minister is not above the law, particularly in awarding honours. The law of the sale of honours is largely contained in two statutes, the Honours (Prevention of Abuses) Act, 1925 and the broader Public Bodies Corrupt Practices Act, 1889.

The 1925 Act concentrates on corrupt procurement. “Any person who accepts or agrees to accept or attempts to obtain from any person for himself or another the grant of a dignity or title of honour is guilty of a misdemeanour, and liable on conviction to imprisonment for two years or a fine of £500 or both.” The 1925 Act was a response to the scandal of the Lloyd George peerages and the activities of his agent Maundy Gregory.

The latest public opinion polls suggest that a 3-1 majority of the public do in fact believe that the Prime Minister has sold peerages. The public suspicion of sleaze is very damaging to the Labour Party; it may force a change of leader.

In May the local elections are expected to be disastrous for Labour. If they are, Tony Blair’s position will be weakened still further. If Mr Blair does not go now, as he should, July should be the latest month. Gordon Brown is the obvious successor.

Mr Brown would then have to decide whether to establish his own mandate by holding an early election. There would be a strong case for him to do so. Like all parties that have been in office for a long time, Labour’s underlying support is falling; even at the past election their vote fell by 1.2 million. By 2010, the last year for the next general election, they are likely to have become even more unpopular. The last year in which Labour could win an overall majority could well be 2006.

At present, Labour has a majority of 64, which means it holds 32 more seats than the other parties combined. On the present timetable about half that majority will be removed by redistribution of the constituencies. That, however, will probably not take place until January 1, 2007. Any election held in 2006 would be fought on the existing boundaries.

If Mr Blair does resign by July the brave course for Mr Brown would be to go to the country in late September or October.

I hope Blair does go soon and there is an election. I can't see an election happening though, Labour will still be financially recovering from the last election. I honestly don't think they will hold an election if they dont think they can afford it themselves.

If it does happen it can only be good news for the BNP. Muslims have been protesting over the cartoons, there were riots in Birmingham, Blair has given up part of our rebate and wants to make us have ID cards. He has also tried to have Nick Griffin sent to jail for speaking his mind. I can't see how that wouldn't benefit the BNP as it is all relatively fresh in our minds unless like Labour, the BNP have very little money to fight a general election.

House of Lords does it again

A school which was told it unlawfully excluded a Muslim pupil for wearing a traditional gown has won its appeal at the House of Lords.

The Court of Appeal had said Denbigh High School had denied Shabina Begum the right to manifest her religion in refusing to allow her to wear a jilbab.

But in a unanimous ruling, judges at the House of Lords overturned that.

Yet again the House of Lords have shown why we need them. I am liking the House of Lords more and more as time goes on.

I am glad that she lost. I think that the hijab and burqua should be banned in all public places including mosques. If muslims don't want to live our way they can live their way in another country.

Scotland Yard to arrest Blair?

SCOTLAND Yard was drawn into the alleged "cash for honours" scandal today to investigate complaints that Labour broke the law.

The Metropolitan Police's specialist crime directorate has launched a probe into the alleged sale of peerages by the Labour Party - after receiving three complaints over suspected breaches of a 1925 law.

Scottish National Party MP Angus MacNeil complained to Met Commissioner Sir Ian Blair and the Director of Public Prosecutions last week after it was revealed that several wealthy individuals had been nominated for peerages after giving Labour loans running into millions of pounds.

I don't know anything about this law but if Scotland Yard are on the case it must be an arrestable offence with (hopefully) jail time. Lets hope Blair finally gets what he deserves, a couple of years in jail sharing a cell and becoming his cell mate's bitch. I doubt anything serious will happen though. There will just be an investigation and nothing will come of it.

DEATH TO EU OFFICIALS!

Two years from now, the European constitution will be in force - certainly de facto and probably de jure, too. Never mind that 15 million Frenchmen and five million swag-bellied Hollanders voted against it.

The Eurocrats have worked out a deft way of getting around them. Here's how they'll do it.

First, they will shove through as many of the constitution's contents as they can under the existing legal framework - a process they had already begun even before the referendums.

Around 85 per cent of the text can, with some creative interpretation, be implemented this way.

True, there are one or two clauses that will require a formal treaty amendment: a European president to replace the system whereby the member nations take it in turns to chair EU meetings; a new voting system; legal personality for the Union.

These outstanding items will be formalised at a miniature inter-governmental conference, probably in 2007. There will be no need to debate them again: all 25 governments accepted them in principle when they signed the constitution 17 months ago.

We shall then be told that these are detailed and technical changes, far too abstruse to be worth pestering the voters with.

The EU will thus have equipped itself with 100 per cent of the constitution, but without having held any more referendums.

Don't take my word for it: listen to what the EU's own leaders are saying. Here is Wolfgang Schüssel, Chancellor of Austria and the EU's current president: "The constitution is not dead."

Here is Angela Merkel, leader of Europe's most powerful and populous state: "Europe needs the constitution… We are willing to make whatever contribution is necessary to bring the constitution into force."

Here is Dominique de Villepin, who, in true European style, has risen to the prime ministership of France without ever having run for elected office: "France did not say no to Europe."

And, on Tuesday, our own Europe minister, Douglas Alexander, repeatedly refused to rule out pushing ahead with the bulk of the text without a referendum.

For the purest statement of the Eurocrats' contempt for the voters, however, we must turn to the constitution's author, Valéry Giscard d'Estaing.

Here is a man who, with his exquisite suits and de haut en bas manner, might be said to personify the EU: so extraordinarily distinguished, as Mallarmé remarked in a different context, that when you bid him bonjour, he makes you feel as though you'd said merde.

"Let's be clear about this," pronounced Giscard a couple of weeks ago. "The rejection of the constitution was a mistake that will have to be corrected."

He went on to remind his audience that the Danish and Irish electorates had once been presumptuous enough to vote against a European treaty, but that no one had paid them the slightest attention.

The EU is proceeding as if the constitution were already in force. Most of the institutions and policies that it would have authorised are being enacted anyway: the External Borders Agency, the European Public Prosecutor, the External Action Service, the Charter of Fundamental Rights, the European Defence Agency, the European Space Programme.

Born out of a reaction against the Second World War, and the plebiscitary democracy that had preceded it, the EU is based on the notion that "populism" (or "democracy", as you and I call it) is a dangerous thing.

Why does anyone think the EU is democratic if they just ignore what the people want? It might be time for a couple of these Europhiles to get their head bashed in. Once these idiots realise that they have to obey the will of the people or get their head smashed in more of them will get the message. Yes I am advocating extreme violence and MURDER against anyone on the EU payroll. If they don't do what we say we, the people can beat them until they are either dead or in a coma. I mean, who do these people think they are?

I like many others are sick of our elected (and unelected) officials deciding what happens to our country when we vote against it happening. It's time some people died. Death or extreme violence is the only thing these people understand and once some die they will get the message. If they dont get the message they will have to die too.

My advice being taken?

There should be a £50,000 limit on donations to political parties and a ban on loans, says David Cameron.

The Tory leader is also pushing for new state funding of political parties in the wake of Labour's loans controversy.

Parties with MPs would get £1.20 from the taxpayer for every vote they won at the last general election - plus an annual payment of 60p per vote won.

That would mean Labour and the Tories getting more than £30m and the Lib Dems about £20m over a four year term.

The Tories are considering cutting the number of MPs to fund the plans.

They say the number of MPs could be reduced from 646 to less than 600. The costs of government special advisers and regional government would also be cut to pay for the changes.

Mr Cameron says he also wants the limit on each party's spending at elections to be cut from £20m to £15m.

His proposals follow Labour's admission it received £14m in undeclared loans.

The Tories are demanding a total ban on loans unless they are from "financial institutions on fully commercial terms".

Looks like thay are taking part of my advice. A couple of news posts ago I said there should be a limit of £50,000 on donations. I don't believe taxpayers should have to fund political parties by the tens of millions.

I also don't believe there should be a limit on party spending if the max donations are £50,000 and I will only support reducing the number of MPs if all constituencies have the same number of people in them unlike now where Labour candidates need the least number of votes to win and the Lib Dems need the most to win which is obviously unfair for the Lib Dems.

FIRE!

FIREFIGHTERS are being equipped with language phrase cards so they can help foreign residents stuck in a blaze.

Grampian fire chiefs have developed a set of language cards with words and pictures in 13 different languages now carried on every rescue tender.

Totally stupid. If foreigners don't want to learn english they can burn to death. It's really up to them.

Whose side are they on?

DIPLOMATS stalled the hunt for the killers of six Red Caps in Iraq because they wanted to be politically correct and save the savages from the gallows.

They blocked Army cops from handing Iraqi authorities vital case files that identified the culprits — so there would be no arrests.

Foreign Office bosses insisted the 18-month delay was necessary to prevent the barbaric tribesmen from facing the death penalty as that would breach THEIR human rights.

A deal done behind closed doors last year means the killers can now only face life in jail. The files on them were handed over at that time.

The delay in the investigation into the massacre almost three years ago now means families may never see justice.

It has given key suspects for the horrendous crime time to flee and made it far harder to secure any convictions in court as witnesses’ recall of events will have diminished.

Whose side are these dipomats on? Why should those murdering savages have the liberty of any human right especially the right of life? They didnt exactly live up to the same standards when it came to the human rights of our soldiers.

Those diplomats that stalled the hunt for the killers should be arrested for murder and helping criminals to escape and whatever else they can think up. After that the diplomats should be rounded up and lynched from the nearest lampost.

This is definately a new low for the leaders of this country. Will political correctness ever be destroyed?

Who is really frustrating the will of the people?

MPs are locked in a twin stand-off with the House of Lords over identity cards and anti-terrorism laws.

Peers have three times defeated the government over proposals to force all passport applicants to get ID cards.

But MPs have again reversed the defeats as Home Secretary Charles Clarke told opponents to stop "frustrating the will of the people".

How are they 'frustrating the will of the people'? I am pretty sure that in the Labour party manifesto they said ID cards would be voluntary and not compulsory. The Lords are just trying to get Labour to do what they promised in their manifesto which the Lying Labour party have no intention of doing.

The Labour party are the ones frustrating the will of the people and the Lords should continue to vote against the plans until Labour go back to the manifesto commitments.

You know this is why we need manifestos to be contracts. That way our governments couldn't lie to us and get away with it.

State funding of political parties

TONY Blair yesterday opened the door to state funding of political parties.

The move, which could cost taxpayers £40million to fund general election campaigns, was one of several reforms proposed in a bid to end sleaze rows threatening his survival.

Mr Blair also said he said he wished to renounce the right to nominate people for honours except in rare cases.

Labour last night refused to comment on a Channel 4 report it received "somewhere in the region" of £12million in undisclosed loans last year.

Lenders were later put forward for peerages by the PM but appointments have been stalled by the independent appointments commission.

Mr Blair made his shock announcement of a new look at taxpayers' cash for political parties at his monthly press conference.

He said: "We should look again at party funding, whether we can further enhance state support."

In exchange parties could accept a "cap" on donations, he explained.

Blair should not be allowed to nominate peers anymore especially when he only allows them in for giving him money.

Personally I like the idea of PARTIAL state funding but with my way it wouldn't cost £40 million. It would be far less with my way. With my way each party would get £10,000 for every MP they get elected which would add up to £6,460,000. They would still be able to get private donations but there would be a cap of £50,000 per year and unions would be banned from giving any money. Unions should use their money to fight for their workers and not try and change the political situation. Political parties should also have to declare all their sources of finance including loans and grants.

It has become clear that no government can be trusted with the House of Lords therefore it should be partially elected. Keep the life and heridary peers that we have now. This is how the election of the lords would go:

There will be 65 elected lords (close enough to 10% of MPs) and the country would be split into 65 lord constituencies.

They will not be allowed to be part of a political party or receive donations from political parties or unions. This is because at the moment the Lords that are part of political parties always go with their party. Independent Lords (in theory) would do what they think is best for the country and not what their party or financer wants them to.

To run they have to pay $5000 (the Lords are supposed to be elitish-We cant have just anyone becoming a lord) which they will not get back even if they win unlike House Of Commons elections where those who get 5% of the vote get their deposit back.

They would be elected for 2 years. Those who have been elected none stop for 20 years will automatically become a life peer. Those who are elected for 30 years none stop (if they continue after being a life peer) will become a partial hereditary peer and their first born child will be allowed to sit in the Lords as a lord but the child dies it won't pass on through the family anymore.

Elected lords will be much more powerful than others. When the Commons uses the Parliament Act after the House of Lords sends a bill back to the Commons the elected lords will meet up. Once the Parliament act is used it still won't go through. It will be given a vote and this time only elected Lords will be allowed to vote on the bill.

I think that would be good enough. What do you guys think?

Elite security in House of Commons

A TERROR suspect allegedly linked to al Qaeda has visited the Houses of Parliament — as the guest of a Labour peer.

Former detainee Mahmoud Suliman Ahmed Abu Rideh even sat in the Commons public gallery for a debate.

He was invited to Westminster on Tuesday by Lord Ahmed, who met him at Regent’s Park mosque three weeks ago.

The father of five — suspected of being a money man for terror groups — was given a SECURITY sticker for his Parliamentary visit.

And he boasted yesterday of sitting in the Commons gallery, adding: “It was very interesting.”

Shadow Home Secretary David Davis last night said Abu Rideh had been able to “walk around one of the UK’s biggest terror targets”.

Lord Ahmed confirmed he invited Abu Rideh, 34, to see him — and said he QUIZZED him over the suspected al Qaeda link.

You thought that was stupid? Well it gets better...Lord Ahmed asked the terror suspect ‘Have you ever been linked with al Qaeda?’ and he denied it. Well you surely can't get better security than that.

Hung parliament at next election?

A cabinet minister will warn Labour tomorrow that it faces the prospect of a hung parliament after the next general election.

Peter Hain, the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland and Wales, will urge Labour to turn its guns on to the Liberal Democrats, accusing the third party of conspiring with the Tories to push Labour out of office.

Mr Hain is the first minister to raise the prospect that Labour may lose its overall majority. Academics believe there is a stronger possibility of a hung parliament than for many years if the Tories maintain their recovery under David Cameron. They predict that a Tory lead of between one and 12 points over Labour in the share of the vote would leave no party with an overall majority.

"Equally, the Liberals' anti-Labour strategy means that their best bet is a hung parliament and joining David Cameron in a coalition," he will say. "Votes for the Lib Dems risk giving the Conservatives a chance to undo all the achievements we have fought for."

Mr Hain will say: "The Cameron camp know they would be defying political gravity to win outright next time: they are coming from too far back, and they don't have the lift-off they need. Indeed they have struck a plateau in the polls nowhere near high enough for the huge swing they need."

Personally I can't see a Liberal-Conservative coalition government but if this hung parliament happens then its going to be a good thing. I dont think any coalition will last for the full 5 years so they will have to call for another election. The more elections there are the more it will benefit the BNP in the long run.

A Liberal-Conservative coalition I think would last a maximum of maybe two years. The fact that the Liberals are in favour of proportional representation and the Conservatives are against it would make the coalition crash and burn.

But anything has to be better than Labour right? Well I dont know, we might end up having the worst of both worlds but a worse country there is then a better chance for the BNP getting into power.

New global warming theory

A new theory to explain global warming was revealed at a meeting at the University of Leicester (UK) and is being considered for publication in the journal "Science First Hand". The controversial theory has nothing to do with burning fossil fuels and atmospheric carbon dioxide levels. According to Vladimir Shaidurov of the Russian Academy of Sciences, the apparent rise in average global temperature recorded by scientists over the last hundred years or so could be due to atmospheric changes that are not connected to human emissions of carbon dioxide from the burning of natural gas and oil. Shaidurov explained how changes in the amount of ice crystals at high altitude could damage the layer of thin, high altitude clouds found in the mesosphere that reduce the amount of warming solar radiation reaching the earth's surface.

Shaidurov has used a detailed analysis of the mean temperature change by year for the last 140 years and explains that there was a slight decrease in temperature until the early twentieth century. This flies in the face of current global warming theories that blame a rise in temperature on rising carbon dioxide emissions since the start of the industrial revolution. Shaidurov, however, suggests that the rise, which began between 1906 and 1909, could have had a very different cause, which he believes was the massive Tunguska Event, which rocked a remote part of Siberia, northwest of Lake Baikal on the 30th June 1908.

The Tunguska Event, sometimes known as the Tungus Meteorite is thought to have resulted from an asteroid or comet entering the earth's atmosphere and exploding. The event released as much energy as fifteen one-megaton atomic bombs. As well as blasting an enormous amount of dust into the atmosphere, felling 60 million trees over an area of more than 2000 square kilometres. Shaidurov suggests that this explosion would have caused "considerable stirring of the high layers of atmosphere and change its structure." Such meteoric disruption was the trigger for the subsequent rise in global temperatures.

Global warming is thought to be caused by the "greenhouse effect". Energy from the sun reaches the earth's surface and warms it, without the greenhouse effect most of this energy is then lost as the heat radiates back into space. However, the presence of so-called greenhouse gases at high altitude absorb much of this energy and then radiate a proportion back towards the earth's surface. Causing temperatures to rise.

Many natural gases and some of those released by conventional power stations, vehicle and aircraft exhausts act as greenhouse gases. Carbon dioxide, natural gas, or methane, and chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) are all potent greenhouse gases. Carbon dioxide and methane are found naturally in the atmosphere, but it is the gradual rise in levels of these gases since the industrial revolution, and in particular the beginning of the twentieth century, that scientists have blamed for the gradual rise in recorded global temperature. Attempts to reverse global warming, such as the Kyoto Protocol, have centred on controlling and even reducing CO2 emissions.

However, the most potent greenhouse gas is water, explains Shaidurov and it is this compound on which his study focuses. According to Shaidurov, only small changes in the atmospheric levels of water, in the form of vapour and ice crystals can contribute to significant changes to the temperature of the earth's surface, which far outweighs the effects of carbon dioxide and other gases released by human activities. Just a rise of 1% of water vapour could raise the global average temperature of Earth's surface more then 4 degrees Celsius.

The role of water vapour in controlling our planet's temperature was hinted at almost 150 years ago by Irish scientist John Tyndall. Tyndall, who also provided an explanation as to why the sky is blue, explained the problem: "The strongest radiant heat absorber, is the most important gas controlling Earth's temperature. Without water vapour, he wrote, the Earth's surface would be 'held fast in the iron grip of frost'." Thin clouds at high altitude allow sunlight to reach the earth's surface, but reflect back radiated heat, acting as an insulating greenhouse layer.

Water vapour levels are even less within our control than CO2 levels. According to Andrew E. Dessler of the Texas A & M University writing in 'The Science and Politics of Global Climate Change', "Human activities do not control all greenhouse gases, however. The most powerful greenhouse gas in the atmosphere is water vapour, he says, "Human activities have little direct control over its atmospheric abundance, which is controlled instead by the worldwide balance between evaporation from the oceans and precipitation."

As such, Shaidurov has concluded that only an enormous natural phenomenon, such as an asteroid or comet impact or airburst, could seriously disturb atmospheric water levels, destroying persistent so-called 'silver', or noctilucent, clouds composed of ice crystals in the high altitude mesosphere (50 to 85km). The Tunguska Event was just such an event, and coincides with the period of time during which global temperatures appear to have been rising the most steadily - the twentieth century. There are many hypothetical mechanisms of how this mesosphere catastrophe might have occurred, and future research is needed to provide a definitive answer.

BNP get a Mayoress!

THE Mayoress of Keighley has been stripped of her position after shocking colleagues by joining the British National Party.
Mayor Tony Wright said after former independent councillor Rose Thompson, 49, told him of her decision that he, "along with many parts of the Keighley community would find her affiliation offensive''.
He also called on her to stand down from the position she has held since the formation of Keighley Town Council four years ago, but she has refused.
The timing of her decision has come at a politically sensitive time in Bradford. Voters will turn out on March 23 in Bradford Council's Keighley West ward to elect a district councillor to replace BNP councillor Angela Clarke who resigned recently.

Fantastic news and just in time for the elections but why was she stripped of her position? Is this normal when someone changes party or is it because she is part of the BNP? If it is because of the BNP then it is totally ridiculous. Why should anyone be stripped of powers that they were elected to just because they have a different political party affiliation and a different political opinion than others?

Why would anyone find her affiliation offensive? Are they offended by freedom and democracy? If so who cares about them. This is a democratic and free country and if people dont like that they can leave.

Hopefully this will give the BNP a boost in their electoral effort in Yorkshire.

Blog of the month

The blog of the month for this month is BNP And Me. This blog gets 7 out of 10.

Enjoy!

Financial collapse coming soon?

The Treasury Department has started drawing from the civil service pension fund to avoid hitting the $8.2 trillion national debt limit. The move to tap the pension fund follows last month's decision to suspend investments in a retirement savings plan held by government employees.

In a letter to Congress this week, Treasury Secretary John W. Snow said he would rely on the Civil Service Retirement and Disability Fund to avoid bumping up against the statutory debt limit.

They are running out of money so much that they have to steal from the retirement fund. Could financial collapse happen soon?

I think it is eventually going to happen and this will only delay it.

Mentally ill destroying nursery rhymes

TRADITIONAL nursery rhymes are being rewritten at nursery schools to avoid causing offence to children.

Instead of singing “Baa baa, black sheep” as generations of children have learnt to do, toddlers in Oxfordshire are being taught to sing “Baa baa, rainbow sheep”.

The move, which critics will seize on as an example of political correctness, was made after the nurseries decided to re-evaluate their approach to equal opportunities.

Stuart Chamberlain, manager of the Family Centre in Abingdon and the Sure Start centre in Sutton Courtenay, Oxfordshire, told the local Courier Journal newspaper: “We have taken the equal opportunities approach to everything we do.

“This is fairly standard across nurseries. We are following stringent equal opportunities rules. No one should feel pointed out because of their race, gender or anything else.”

In keeping with the new approach, teachers at the nurseries have reportedly also changed the ending of Humpty Dumpty so as not to upset the children and dropped the seven dwarfs from the title of Snow White.

Why are these people doing this? The people doing this are mentally ill and need to be in a padded room for life.

Personally I can't ever remember getting upset when Humpty Dumpty couldn't be put back together again and if anyone does get upset they arent going to get far in life if they get upset over silly things like that.

Someone should make up something like an 'anti political correctness day' where we just sing these nursery rhymes outside schools that have changed them and do a small snow white play. Would be funny when the escapee mental patients (liberals) got up in arms about it. I can see it now.

Labour destroys local democracy

Thanks to a diktat from John Prescott, thousands of elected councillors have been shocked to be instructed by council officials that they are no longer permitted to represent the views of the communities which elected them.

Similar instances are sprouting up all over the country, thanks to zealous interpretation by council "monitoring officers" of Mr Prescott's Local Authorities (Code of Conduct) Order 2001. By excluding from council business any councillor who can be considered to have a "prejudicial interest", the code is now being widely used to silence councillors who wish to speak on behalf of the communities they represent.

And, like the bulk of the laws which now rule our lives, this astonishing revolution in local government was imposed by means of a statutory instrument - a ministerial edict which Parliament had no chance to discuss.

Labour continues to destroy our hard won freedoms and democracy. Why on Earth do people let them get away with this? They don't care about the opinions of the people of this country. All they care about is their opinions and their undeserved fat pay check. Why can't this fat bastard John Prescott do us a favour and just have a heart attack?

Why doesn't labour realise that we elect people to represent our interests and not theirs? If they don't realise that perhaps its time to use force to change their minds. Someone should start up a semi-militant pressure group. Those politicians that continue to vote to take away our freedoms should have their neighbourhoods invaded by protesters who won't go away until they do what we say. If they still continue to do so maybe it would be best for someone to firebomb their homes while they are in them and block any rescue attempts that are made. Its time Labour realised we wont take anymore of their crap.

Labour grovells at the feet of the EU

THOUSANDS of rural post offices were saved from closure yesterday when European regulators approved £150 million a year in government aid for the Royal Mail's retail arm.

Post Office Ltd (POL) will now be granted the money to fund country branches, which include more than 1,000 in Scotland, for the next two years.

The decision by the European Commission will come as a huge relief to rural communities after Adam Crozier, chief executive of the Royal Mail warned that more than 10,000 post offices across Britain could close within the next four years.

The government requires POL to keep rural counters open, even if they are loss-making, to give local communities access to essential services such as income support and postal operations.

But ministers had to persuade Brussels that the extension of the funding did not represent unfair state aid.

Neelie Kroes, the EU Competition Commissioner, said: "I am satisfied that the funding is proportionate to POL's public services obligation.

This is rediculous. Why should our government have to ask the EU if we can keep the post office running. Its our money we should spend it on what we want. The government should not have to go grovelling to the EU to ask if we can fun our own things.

We should get out of the EU now. Elect a none traitorous government as soon as possible and leave.

Blog of the month

The blog of the month for this month is Sir John Bull. It gets a 7 out of 10.

John Bull is a political commentator who has his own column in a magazine called Right Now!

Possible conspiracy against the BNP

In the last few days I realised something which I can see happening. On one of his radio shows, Hal turner said that Nick Griffin (leader of the BNP) will be coming to the American Renaissance Conference this Saturday in America.

Is this a wise choice with him facing a retrial? Don't we have laws in this country which would mean he would be arrested for trying to flee the country while on bail? Nick might not have realised this but I think the government has. On the day that he gets on his plane (probably tomorrow) we could see him being arrested. The media will then make a big thing of it and then the government will have won and it will put a larger dent in the reputation of the BNP.

Of course they could just let him go and it might not even be illegal but I wouldn't want him taking that chance.

How likely is it?

Blair wants your freedom

LAST WEEK all eyes were on the House of Commons as it debated identity cards, smoking and terrorism. The media reported both what MPs said and how they voted. For one week at least, the Commons mattered.

All the more peculiar then that the previous Thursday, in an almost deserted chamber, the Government proposed an extraordinary Bill that will drastically reduce parliamentary discussion of future laws, a Bill some constitutional experts are already calling “the Abolition of Parliament Bill”.

A couple of journalists noticed, including Daniel Finkelstein of The Times, and a couple more pricked up their ears last week when I highlighted some biting academic criticism of the Bill on the letters page of this paper. But beyond those rarefied circles, that we are sleepwalking into a new and sinister world of ministerial power seems barely to have registered.

The boring title of the Legislative and Regulatory Reform Bill hides an astonishing proposal. It gives ministers power to alter any law passed by Parliament. The only limitations are that new crimes cannot be created if the penalty is greater than two years in prison and that it cannot increase taxation. But any other law can be changed, no matter how important. All ministers will have to do is propose an order, wait a few weeks and, voilà, the law is changed.

For ministers the advantages are obvious: no more tedious debates in which they have to answer awkward questions. Instead of a full day’s debate on the principle of the proposal, detailed line-by-line examination in committee, a second chance at specific amendment in the Commons and a final debate and vote, ministers will have to face at most a short debate in a committee and a one-and-a-half hour debate on the floor. Frequently the Government will face less than that. No amendments will be allowed. The legislative process will be reduced to a game of take-it-or-leave-it.

The Bill replaces an existing law that allows ministers to relieve regulatory burdens. Business was enthusiastic about that principle and the Government seems to have convinced the business lobby that the latest Bill is just a new, improved version. What makes the new law different, however, is not only that it allows the Government to create extra regulation, including new crimes, but also that it allows ministers to change the structure of government itself. There might be business people so attached to the notion of efficiency and so ignorant or scornful of the principles of democracy that they find such a proposition attractive. Ordinary citizens should find it alarming.

Any body created by statute, including local authorities, the courts and even companies, might find themselves reorganised or even abolished. Since the powers of the House of Lords are defined in Acts of Parliament, even they are subject to the Bill.

Looking back at last week’s business in the Commons, the Bill makes a mockery of the decisions MPs took. Carrying ID cards could be made compulsory, smoking in one’s own home could be outlawed and the definition of terrorism altered to make ordinary political protest punishable by life imprisonment. Nor will the Human Rights Act save us since the Bill makes no exception for it.

The Bill, bizarrely, even applies to itself, so that ministers could propose orders to remove the limitations about two-year sentences and taxation. It also includes a few desultory questions (along the lines of “am I satisfied that I am doing the right thing?”) that ministers have to ask themselves before proceeding, all drafted subjectively so that court challenges will fail, no matter how preposterous the minister’s answer. Even these questions can be removed using the Bill’s own procedure. Indeed, at its most extreme, in a manoeuvre akin to a legislative Indian rope trick, ministers could use it to transfer all legislative power permanently to themselves.

I recall how Hitler became a dictator. He used an act just like this. Do we really want an enabling act in this country? Do we really want more of a dictator-like government than we already have? Already in the last few months we have seen the utter contempt for democracy and freedom that this Labour regime have by making ID cards legal and also making it illegal to protest outside the House of Parliament.

I heard a couple of days ago the government were going to postpone the council elections. The government has since decided not to do this but why would they do such a thing in the first place? Maybe this enabling act is there to ban any more council elections and do away with local government or maybe in the much worse scenario they get rid of the Lords and the royal family which are at present their only real opposition. If they get rid of them they can then use it to give all our sovereignty to the European Union and we become just a state like Texas in the USA.

Whatever it is intended to be used for it must be stopped. No government should have that much power, the power to take away any freedom and democracy.

If you are reading this you must tell as many people as you can about this before it is too late. Our only hope may be the rebel Labour MPs who are sick of what their own party are doing. Failing that our only hope will be the Lords. Lets hope Bair doesn't use the Parliament act.

Justice?

TWO Iraqi rioters filmed being beaten by British troops will be charged with attempted murder.

The men were pulled from a mob and taken captive after hurling home-made grenades at a British base in the flashpoint town of al-Amarah in 2004.

Now, despite rage at the beatings, Iraqi officials eager to reassert power have pledged to bring them to justice.

A Whitehall source said yesterday: "The chief of police and other officials gave their assurance they will be prosecuted for attempted murder.

"They know who these men are and lifting them won't be a problem."

The suspects were among four men seen in a video being beaten by squaddies. In a separate investigation all four have been quizzed by military police.

Three soldiers from the 1st Battalion, The Light Infantry, have been arrested.

I agree with arresting the rioters but it is ridiculous that our soldiers are arrested for giving those iraqis a beating they more than deserved. The soldiers were easy on them. Personally I would have opened fire and killed every rioter in the vicinity.

Protesting is good but you have no right to riot and those that do riot should be shot on site.

Let our brave soldiers go.

Muslims want sharia law in Britain

Four out of 10 British Muslims want sharia law introduced into parts of the country, a survey reveals today.

This just proves that muslims do not want to integrate. They want their own way. They don't care about Britain as long as it is majority none muslim.

The Labour party won't do anything about it. They rely too much on the muslim vote. As long as Labour rely on their vote we will get nothing done about it. Labour care more about their muslim voters than the lives and liberties of the British people.

A few years ago Denmark faced the same problem. They used homosexuals to stop it happening. British patriots must form an alliance with homosexuals in the fight against the cancer of Islam.

In Denmark members of gay and lesbian associations made a list of the sexual partners they had who were muslim and told the press that if muslims kept on lobbying for shariah law, they would send the newspapers the lists of the muslim lovers they had.

Needless to say, it stopped, and muslims never spoke again of it again in Denmark.

We must do the same here. HOMOSEXUALS UNITE!

I didn't think homosexuals were useful for anything. Looks like they can be our first and most important line of defence against muslims.

Obesity caused by addictive additive?

I wondered if there could be an actual chemical causing the massive obesity epidemic, so did a friend of mine, John Erb.

He was a research assistant at the University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada and spent years working for the government.

He made an amazing discovery while going through scientific journals for a book he was writing called "The Slow Poisoning of America." In hundreds of studies around the world, scientists were creating obese mice and rats to use in diet or diabetes test studies.

No strain of rat or mice is naturally obese, so the scientists have to create them. They make these morbidly obese creatures by injecting them with MSG when they are first born. The MSG triples the amount of insulin the pancreas creates, causing rats (and humans?) to become obese they even have a title for the race of fat rodents they create: "MSG-Treated Rats" MSG?

I was shocked too. I went to my kitchen, checking the cupboards and the fridge. MSG was in everything! The Campbell's soups, the Hostess Doritos, the Lays flavored potato chips, Top Ramen, Betty Crocker Hamburger Helper, Heinz canned gravy, Swanson frozen prepared meals, Kraft salad dressings, especially the 'healthy low fat' ones. The items that didn't have MSG had something called Hydrolyzed Vegetable Protein, which is just another name for Monosodium Glutamate. It was shocking to see just how many of the foods we feed our children everyday are filled with this stuff. They hide MSG under many different names in order to fool those who catch on.

But it didn't stop there. When our family went out to eat, we started asking at the restaurants what menu items had MSG. Many employees, even the managers, swore they didn't use MSG. But when we ask for the ingredient list which they grudgingly provided, sure enough MSG and Hydrolyzed Vegetable Protein were everywhere. Burger King, McDonalds, Wendy's, Taco Bell, every restaurant, even the sit down ones like TGIF, Chilis', Applebees and Denny's use MSG in abundance. Kentucky Fried Chicken seemed to be the WORST offender: MSG as in every chicken dish, salad dressing and gravy. No wonder I loved to eat that coating on the skin, their secret spice was MSG!

So why is MSG in so may of the foods we eat? Is it a preservative or a vitamin? Not according to my friend John. In the book he wrote, an expose of the food additive industry called "The Slow Poisoning of America", www.spofamerica.com , he said that MSG is added to food for the addictive effect it has on the human body. Even the propaganda website sponsored by the food manufacturers lobby group supporting MSG at: http://www.msgfacts.com/facts/msgfact12.html explains that the reason they add it to food is to make people eat more.

A study of elderly people showed that people eat more of the foods that it is added to. The Glutamate Association lobby group says eating more benefits the elderly, but what does it do to the rest of us?

'Betcha can't eat just one', takes on a whole new meaning where MSG is concerned! And we wonder why the nation is overweight?

The MSG manufacturers themselves admit that it addicts people to their products. It makes people choose their product over others, and makes people eat more of it than they would if MSG wasn't added. Not only is MSG scientifically proven to cause obesity, it is an addictive substance!

Since its introduction into the American food supply fifty years ago, MSG has been added in larger and larger doses to the prepackaged meals, soups, snacks and fast foods we are tempted to eat everyday.

The FDA has set no limits on how much of it can be added to food. They claim it's safe to eat in any amount. How can they claim it is safe when there are hundreds of scientific studies with titles like these?

The monosodium glutamate (MSG) obese rat as a model for the study of exercise in obesity. Gobatto CA, Mello MA, Souza CT, Ribeiro IA. Res Commun Mol PatholPharmacol. 2002

Adrenalectomy abolishes the food-induced hypothalamic serotonin release in both normal and monosodium glutamate-obese rats. Guimaraes RB, Telles MM,Coelho VB, Mori RC, Nascimento CM, Ribeiro Brain Res Bull. 2002 Aug

Obesity induced by neonatal monosodium glutamate treatment in spontaneously hypertensive rats: an animal model of multiple risk factors. Yamamoto M, Iino K, Ichikawa K, Shinohara N, Yoshinari Fujishima Hypertens Res. 1998 Mar

Hypothalamic lesion induced by injection of monosodium glutamate in suckling period and subsequent development of obesity. Tanaka K, Shimada M,Nakao K, Kusunoki Exp Neurol. 1978 Oct

Yes, that last study was not a typo, it WAS written in 1978.

Both the medical research community and food "manufacturers" have known MSG's side effects for decades! Many more studies mentioned in John Erb's book link MSG to Diabetes, Migraines and headaches, Autism, ADHD and even Alzheimer's. But what can we do to stop the food manufactures from dumping fattening and addictive MSG into our food supply and causing the obesity epidemic we now see? Even as you read this, George W. Bush and his corporate supporters are pushing a Bill through Congress. Called the "PersonalResponsibility in Food Consumption Act" also known as the "Cheeseburger Bill "this sweeping law bans anyone from suing food manufacturers, sellers and distributors. Even if it comes out that they purposely added an addictive chemical to their foods." Read about it for yourself at: http://www.realcities.com/mld/krwashington/8458081.htm

"Last month the House of Representatives passed the "Personal Responsibility in Food Consumption Act" to protect the food and beverage industry from civil lawsuits. Under the measure, known as the "Cheeseburger Bill," people who buy food or drinks couldn't sue the companies that made them, the stores that sold them or the restaurants that served them if they got fat from the products, so long as the products met existing laws. The Senate is expected to take up a similar bill later this year."

The Bill has already been rushed through the House of Representatives, and is due for the same rubber stamp at Senate level. It is important that Bush and his corporate supporters get it through before the media lets everyone know about MSG, the intentional Nicotine for food.

Several months ago, John Erb took his book and his concerns to one of the highest government health officials in Canada. While sitting in the Government office, the official told him "Sure I know how bad MSG is, I wouldn't touch the stuff!" But this top-level government official refused to tell the public what he knew. The big media doesn't want to tell the public either, fearing legal issues with their advertisers. It seems that the fallout on the fast food industry may hurt their profit margin.

So what do we do? The food producers and restaurants have been addicting us to their products for years, and now we are paying the price for it. Our children should not be cursed with obesity caused by an addictive food additive. But what can I do about it? I'm just one voice, what can I do to stop the poisoning of our children, while guys like Bush are insuring financial protection for the industry that is poisoning us.

I for one am doing something about it. I have published this email and URGE you to get this link out to everyone you because I am showing you the truth that the corporate owned politicians and media won't tell you. The best way you can help save yourself and your children from this drug-induced epidemic, is to forward this to everyone. With any luck, it will circle the globe before Bush can pass the Bill protecting those who poisoned us. The food industry learned a lot from the tobacco industry. Imagine if big tobacco had a bill like this in place before someone blew the whistle on Nicotine? Blow the whistle on MSG.

If you are one of the few who can still believe that MSG is good for us, and you don't believe what John Erb has to say, see for yourself. Go to the National Library of Medicine, at www.pubmed.com. Type in the words "MSG Obese", and read a few of the 115 medical studies that appear.

We do not want to be rats in one giant experiment, and we do not approve of food that makes us into a nation of obese, lethargic, addicted sheep, waiting for the slaughter. With your help we can put an end to this, and stop the Slow Poisoning of America.

Let's save our children says (John Erb) ...

Just a thought...

If you are one of those brainwashed lemmings who think that Islam is a wonderful religion then you should really think about this:

In the last few days there has been many protests in muslim countries about the islamic caricatures (if you dont know about it google it) in a Denmark newspaper which has now been put in other newspapers around the world. Did you ever see any of these protests against muslims blowing themselves up in different countries? When was the last time muslims protested against islamic terrorism?

I haven't even saw these so called moderates protesting.

Maybe these muslims should get their priorities in order. If they think making a caricature of Muhammed is worse than blowing innocent people up then they are proving that they are in fact savages and that muslims do not deserve to live in a majority white society until they start being civilised.


Just a thought 2...
If there are any muslims reading this I have a couple of completely unrelated questions for you. Does Islam consider paedophilia a sin? If so how old does the child have to be before it is no longer paedophilia? If paedophilia isn't a sin then surely Islam is for paedophilia? If Islam is against paedophilia why did Muhammed have sex with a 6 year old?

If islam is against paedophilia your own prophet didn't even care about those laws so how can you claim your religion is a good one? how can you claim he was a prophet? doesn't this prove that your whole religion is false?

If islam is for paedophilia then your religion is in fact vile and wicked, but not only that you also worship a paedopile who raped a 6 year old girl. How does that make you feel? How is your religion a good one when it is for raping innocent children?

Victory for freedom

A jury at Leeds Crown Court has cleared BNP leader Nick Griffin of two racial hatred charges and BNP activist Mark Collett of four others.

The jury has been discharged after failing to reach verdicts on the remaining charges - four against Mr Collett and two against Mr Griffin.

Mr Griffin, 44, and Mr Collett, 24, had denied using words intended to stir up hatred in West Yorkshire in 2004.

Mr Griffin said the verdicts were a "tremendous victory for freedom".

Their six speeches were filmed by an undercover BBC journalist for a documentary on the BNP.

Mr Griffin told supporters outside the court that the verdicts were a "fantastic day for the people of this country".

This is a victory for freedom and a loss for those totalitarian scum (Blair and co) who want to take our liberties away. I hope that Blair will realise that the people of Britain will no longer stand for the destruction of our freedoms and I hope he knows his party's days in power are numbered.

At first hearing that they had a muslim juror in the case made me think that they would be found guilty. They should have never been allowed to have a muslim juror in a case against someone who said something bad about their religion. Doesn't that seem like the muslim could show bias? maybe the government planned it that way thinking they could get away with it?


UPDATE: The totalitarian anti freedom Blair regime has decided to retry Nick Griffin's and Mark Collett's cases in the hope of finding them guilty. Lets hope they are found innocent.

Blog of the month

As most brits know Nick Griffin leader of the BNP is on trial for violating Britain's anti-free speech laws. Whatever the verdict is the BNP cannot lose. If they are found guilty it will show that there is infact no free speech left in this country. If he is found innocent it will show that he was telling the truth about muslims.

Whatever happens he should be found innocent as this anti-freedom law is against the most important part of our society-free speech. If you can only say good things how is that free speech?

To keep up to date with how Nick and Mark are doing you can go to their blog,Free Speech on Trial which is the blog of the month for this month. I give it a 6 out of 10.

America to run out of money by march?

Treasury Secretary John Snow has warned that unless Congress raises the national debt limit, the US government will run out of cash to finance its daily work in two months.

In a letter to Senate leaders Thursday, Snow said the statutory debt limit imposed by Congress of 8.184 trillion dollars would be reached in mid-February and the government would then lose its borrowing power.

"At that time, unless the debt limit is raised or the Treasury Department takes authorized extraordinary actions, we will be unable to continue to finance government operations," said the letter, seen by AFP.

Snow warned that even if the Treasury took "all available prudent and legal actions" to avoid breaching the ceiling, "we anticipate that we can finance government operations no longer than mid-March".

Mid march they say? wow that coincides with the time when the federal reserve stops reporting M3 data. This conspiracy seems to be coming together like clockwork. Am I the only one that can see this?

At the same time they are about to run out of money they are going to stop reporting the money they make which will allow the American government to make as much money as they can, in the short term of course as they will be most likely found out.

Is this a coincidence or is this really going to happen? personally I hope not but if it does you heard it here when no other lying and traitorous news outlet would report about it.

28% support for EU

The European Union was hit with more bad news today, with a new poll showing that overall public support of the EU project dropped by 4% since a previous survey.

Austria – which takes over the EU presidency in January – leads the pack of those most against EU membership.

The poll found that 50% of those questioned thought that membership of their country in the 25-nation bloc was “a good thing”.

A previous survey conducted in the spring had EU support at 54%. Support was the lowest in Austria, with just 25% thinking their nation’s membership of the union was positive.


Britain was second lowest with only 28% supporting EU membership. The highest support was found in tiny Luxembourg, with 82% support of the EU.

The survey comes in a year of setbacks for the EU, after French and Dutch voters rejected the EU constitution in May and June.

EU leaders did, however, manage to get a deal on new slimmed-down EU spending plans at a summit last weekend.


BRING ON THE REFERENDUM!

It's time for our leaders to face up to what we want and stop being traitors. We want out. We don't want to be in the EU anymore and only crappy insignificant countries like luxembourg want to be in. If we do not get a referendum it might be time to elect a government that will give us what we want that doesn't sell us out.

Our government will never let us decide without the British people demanding it so please sign this petition for an EU referendum in Britain.

Gold hits 540 dollars

Gold continued to defy gravity Monday, topping $540 (U.S.) an ounce and trading at its highest level in almost 25 years.

The move comes after gold futures last week surged to their biggest weekly gain since February, 2002 as investors scrambled to bolster their portfolios with one of the world's hottest assets, and protect themselves from the growing threat of inflation.

Analysts at National Bank Financial, meantime, expect gold will hit $600 an ounce in the next 18 to 24 months.

Spot gold rose as high as $540.90 an ounce Monday, the highest since 1981. The move also sent platinum to its highest since 1980 and silver to its highest since 1987.

We all know why this is happening but the news doesn't seem to be reporting what is happening. The M3 data still hasn't been reported on any major news outlet and it doesn't look like it will.

If you are American I urge you to contact your representatives in government and tell them what is happening and do something about it. If they don't do anything about it you may have to consider finding out where they live so when the economic collapse comes you can go to their homes and lynch the lot of them.

Coming world recession

The American Federal Reserve Board of Governors decided on November 10th that they will stop reporting the M3 as of March, 2006.

For those who don't know the M3 is the quantity of money they print into ciruclation. As they print more and more money, what we have in our hands is all worth less.

The fact that they have done this is extremely strange. Why would they do this? The only reason that I can think of is that they are going to be printing loads of money for some reason and they need to hide it. After the Treaty of Versaille Germany needed to do just that to pay off all their debt. This lead to hyperinflation which made a wheelbarrow of money worthless as it couldn't even be enough to buy a loaf of bread.

So why would they want that? I don't understand the reasoning behind it. Maybe they can think they can get away with printing more money without the world finding out. Maybe it is just to save a bit of money for not reporting it. If that is the case it will still lead to investors pulling out of the dollar as it will be a very unreliable currency which will devastate the American economy which would also destroy the economies of the rest of the world putting the world into an even worse recession than the 1929 wall street crash.

The rich seem to already know what is happening and have already started buying the only things that will be worth anything when the crisis hits, and it will.

Last month the price of gold was just under 500 USD, which was the highest since 1987. This week it has pushed to 530 dollars which is a 25 year high and it looks as if it will climb even further.

So far I have yet to see any major news outlet report on the M3 data which means they are seriously ignorant of it or are choosing not to report it for some odd reason or I just haven't been looking hard enough.

I think within 6 months of them ceasing to report the M3 data we will see the first signs of a global recession as world leaders look like they are starting to panic


The only reason I can think of for this happening is a conspiracy so if you don't believe in conspiracies don't read any further:



The inevitable collapse in the world economy, plus the rising oil prices will cripple the world. World leaders will decide that it would be best if we all worked together and a global government will be formed who will miraculously find a solution to the problems and the citizens will all love the new government who were actually behind the crisis.

I predict a global government as early as 2009 if I am correct about this. Even if the news outlets know about this I doubt they will report it as I think they are in on it too. The people who own the news have no loyalty to anything except money and will probably be getting well paid for their contribution.

The only hope there is to spread the word is the internet but the US are planning to let the UN (who will probably be the global government) control over it. The UN has already decided to censor some of the internet. Their excuse is some websites (like stormfront) are illegal in some countries.

Blog of the month

The blog of the month this month is The Hal Turner Show. Ok. It isn't actually a blog but its set out a bit like one. It is also a radio show.

Hal Turner is an American Pro white conservative republican who hosts a show called The Hal Turner Show which is very informative and he says what I am saying... well he does the majority of the time.

If you are easily offended you can go screw yourself while the rest of us listen to his show.

I give The Hal Turner Show a 9 out of 10 rating.