Labour destroys local democracy
Thanks to a diktat from John Prescott, thousands of elected councillors have been shocked to be instructed by council officials that they are no longer permitted to represent the views of the communities which elected them.
Similar instances are sprouting up all over the country, thanks to zealous interpretation by council "monitoring officers" of Mr Prescott's Local Authorities (Code of Conduct) Order 2001. By excluding from council business any councillor who can be considered to have a "prejudicial interest", the code is now being widely used to silence councillors who wish to speak on behalf of the communities they represent.
And, like the bulk of the laws which now rule our lives, this astonishing revolution in local government was imposed by means of a statutory instrument - a ministerial edict which Parliament had no chance to discuss.
Labour continues to destroy our hard won freedoms and democracy. Why on Earth do people let them get away with this? They don't care about the opinions of the people of this country. All they care about is their opinions and their undeserved fat pay check. Why can't this fat bastard John Prescott do us a favour and just have a heart attack?
Why doesn't labour realise that we elect people to represent our interests and not theirs? If they don't realise that perhaps its time to use force to change their minds. Someone should start up a semi-militant pressure group. Those politicians that continue to vote to take away our freedoms should have their neighbourhoods invaded by protesters who won't go away until they do what we say. If they still continue to do so maybe it would be best for someone to firebomb their homes while they are in them and block any rescue attempts that are made. Its time Labour realised we wont take anymore of their crap.
Monday, February 27, 2006
Saturday, February 25, 2006
Labour grovells at the feet of the EU
THOUSANDS of rural post offices were saved from closure yesterday when European regulators approved £150 million a year in government aid for the Royal Mail's retail arm.
Post Office Ltd (POL) will now be granted the money to fund country branches, which include more than 1,000 in Scotland, for the next two years.
The decision by the European Commission will come as a huge relief to rural communities after Adam Crozier, chief executive of the Royal Mail warned that more than 10,000 post offices across Britain could close within the next four years.
The government requires POL to keep rural counters open, even if they are loss-making, to give local communities access to essential services such as income support and postal operations.
But ministers had to persuade Brussels that the extension of the funding did not represent unfair state aid.
Neelie Kroes, the EU Competition Commissioner, said: "I am satisfied that the funding is proportionate to POL's public services obligation.
This is rediculous. Why should our government have to ask the EU if we can keep the post office running. Its our money we should spend it on what we want. The government should not have to go grovelling to the EU to ask if we can fun our own things.
We should get out of the EU now. Elect a none traitorous government as soon as possible and leave.
THOUSANDS of rural post offices were saved from closure yesterday when European regulators approved £150 million a year in government aid for the Royal Mail's retail arm.
Post Office Ltd (POL) will now be granted the money to fund country branches, which include more than 1,000 in Scotland, for the next two years.
The decision by the European Commission will come as a huge relief to rural communities after Adam Crozier, chief executive of the Royal Mail warned that more than 10,000 post offices across Britain could close within the next four years.
The government requires POL to keep rural counters open, even if they are loss-making, to give local communities access to essential services such as income support and postal operations.
But ministers had to persuade Brussels that the extension of the funding did not represent unfair state aid.
Neelie Kroes, the EU Competition Commissioner, said: "I am satisfied that the funding is proportionate to POL's public services obligation.
This is rediculous. Why should our government have to ask the EU if we can keep the post office running. Its our money we should spend it on what we want. The government should not have to go grovelling to the EU to ask if we can fun our own things.
We should get out of the EU now. Elect a none traitorous government as soon as possible and leave.
Blog of the month
The blog of the month for this month is Sir John Bull. It gets a 7 out of 10.
John Bull is a political commentator who has his own column in a magazine called Right Now!
The blog of the month for this month is Sir John Bull. It gets a 7 out of 10.
John Bull is a political commentator who has his own column in a magazine called Right Now!
Thursday, February 23, 2006
Possible conspiracy against the BNP
In the last few days I realised something which I can see happening. On one of his radio shows, Hal turner said that Nick Griffin (leader of the BNP) will be coming to the American Renaissance Conference this Saturday in America.
Is this a wise choice with him facing a retrial? Don't we have laws in this country which would mean he would be arrested for trying to flee the country while on bail? Nick might not have realised this but I think the government has. On the day that he gets on his plane (probably tomorrow) we could see him being arrested. The media will then make a big thing of it and then the government will have won and it will put a larger dent in the reputation of the BNP.
Of course they could just let him go and it might not even be illegal but I wouldn't want him taking that chance.
How likely is it?
In the last few days I realised something which I can see happening. On one of his radio shows, Hal turner said that Nick Griffin (leader of the BNP) will be coming to the American Renaissance Conference this Saturday in America.
Is this a wise choice with him facing a retrial? Don't we have laws in this country which would mean he would be arrested for trying to flee the country while on bail? Nick might not have realised this but I think the government has. On the day that he gets on his plane (probably tomorrow) we could see him being arrested. The media will then make a big thing of it and then the government will have won and it will put a larger dent in the reputation of the BNP.
Of course they could just let him go and it might not even be illegal but I wouldn't want him taking that chance.
How likely is it?
Tuesday, February 21, 2006
Blair wants your freedom
LAST WEEK all eyes were on the House of Commons as it debated identity cards, smoking and terrorism. The media reported both what MPs said and how they voted. For one week at least, the Commons mattered.
All the more peculiar then that the previous Thursday, in an almost deserted chamber, the Government proposed an extraordinary Bill that will drastically reduce parliamentary discussion of future laws, a Bill some constitutional experts are already calling “the Abolition of Parliament Bill”.
A couple of journalists noticed, including Daniel Finkelstein of The Times, and a couple more pricked up their ears last week when I highlighted some biting academic criticism of the Bill on the letters page of this paper. But beyond those rarefied circles, that we are sleepwalking into a new and sinister world of ministerial power seems barely to have registered.
The boring title of the Legislative and Regulatory Reform Bill hides an astonishing proposal. It gives ministers power to alter any law passed by Parliament. The only limitations are that new crimes cannot be created if the penalty is greater than two years in prison and that it cannot increase taxation. But any other law can be changed, no matter how important. All ministers will have to do is propose an order, wait a few weeks and, voilà, the law is changed.
For ministers the advantages are obvious: no more tedious debates in which they have to answer awkward questions. Instead of a full day’s debate on the principle of the proposal, detailed line-by-line examination in committee, a second chance at specific amendment in the Commons and a final debate and vote, ministers will have to face at most a short debate in a committee and a one-and-a-half hour debate on the floor. Frequently the Government will face less than that. No amendments will be allowed. The legislative process will be reduced to a game of take-it-or-leave-it.
The Bill replaces an existing law that allows ministers to relieve regulatory burdens. Business was enthusiastic about that principle and the Government seems to have convinced the business lobby that the latest Bill is just a new, improved version. What makes the new law different, however, is not only that it allows the Government to create extra regulation, including new crimes, but also that it allows ministers to change the structure of government itself. There might be business people so attached to the notion of efficiency and so ignorant or scornful of the principles of democracy that they find such a proposition attractive. Ordinary citizens should find it alarming.
Any body created by statute, including local authorities, the courts and even companies, might find themselves reorganised or even abolished. Since the powers of the House of Lords are defined in Acts of Parliament, even they are subject to the Bill.
Looking back at last week’s business in the Commons, the Bill makes a mockery of the decisions MPs took. Carrying ID cards could be made compulsory, smoking in one’s own home could be outlawed and the definition of terrorism altered to make ordinary political protest punishable by life imprisonment. Nor will the Human Rights Act save us since the Bill makes no exception for it.
The Bill, bizarrely, even applies to itself, so that ministers could propose orders to remove the limitations about two-year sentences and taxation. It also includes a few desultory questions (along the lines of “am I satisfied that I am doing the right thing?”) that ministers have to ask themselves before proceeding, all drafted subjectively so that court challenges will fail, no matter how preposterous the minister’s answer. Even these questions can be removed using the Bill’s own procedure. Indeed, at its most extreme, in a manoeuvre akin to a legislative Indian rope trick, ministers could use it to transfer all legislative power permanently to themselves.
I recall how Hitler became a dictator. He used an act just like this. Do we really want an enabling act in this country? Do we really want more of a dictator-like government than we already have? Already in the last few months we have seen the utter contempt for democracy and freedom that this Labour regime have by making ID cards legal and also making it illegal to protest outside the House of Parliament.
I heard a couple of days ago the government were going to postpone the council elections. The government has since decided not to do this but why would they do such a thing in the first place? Maybe this enabling act is there to ban any more council elections and do away with local government or maybe in the much worse scenario they get rid of the Lords and the royal family which are at present their only real opposition. If they get rid of them they can then use it to give all our sovereignty to the European Union and we become just a state like Texas in the USA.
Whatever it is intended to be used for it must be stopped. No government should have that much power, the power to take away any freedom and democracy.
If you are reading this you must tell as many people as you can about this before it is too late. Our only hope may be the rebel Labour MPs who are sick of what their own party are doing. Failing that our only hope will be the Lords. Lets hope Bair doesn't use the Parliament act.
LAST WEEK all eyes were on the House of Commons as it debated identity cards, smoking and terrorism. The media reported both what MPs said and how they voted. For one week at least, the Commons mattered.
All the more peculiar then that the previous Thursday, in an almost deserted chamber, the Government proposed an extraordinary Bill that will drastically reduce parliamentary discussion of future laws, a Bill some constitutional experts are already calling “the Abolition of Parliament Bill”.
A couple of journalists noticed, including Daniel Finkelstein of The Times, and a couple more pricked up their ears last week when I highlighted some biting academic criticism of the Bill on the letters page of this paper. But beyond those rarefied circles, that we are sleepwalking into a new and sinister world of ministerial power seems barely to have registered.
The boring title of the Legislative and Regulatory Reform Bill hides an astonishing proposal. It gives ministers power to alter any law passed by Parliament. The only limitations are that new crimes cannot be created if the penalty is greater than two years in prison and that it cannot increase taxation. But any other law can be changed, no matter how important. All ministers will have to do is propose an order, wait a few weeks and, voilà, the law is changed.
For ministers the advantages are obvious: no more tedious debates in which they have to answer awkward questions. Instead of a full day’s debate on the principle of the proposal, detailed line-by-line examination in committee, a second chance at specific amendment in the Commons and a final debate and vote, ministers will have to face at most a short debate in a committee and a one-and-a-half hour debate on the floor. Frequently the Government will face less than that. No amendments will be allowed. The legislative process will be reduced to a game of take-it-or-leave-it.
The Bill replaces an existing law that allows ministers to relieve regulatory burdens. Business was enthusiastic about that principle and the Government seems to have convinced the business lobby that the latest Bill is just a new, improved version. What makes the new law different, however, is not only that it allows the Government to create extra regulation, including new crimes, but also that it allows ministers to change the structure of government itself. There might be business people so attached to the notion of efficiency and so ignorant or scornful of the principles of democracy that they find such a proposition attractive. Ordinary citizens should find it alarming.
Any body created by statute, including local authorities, the courts and even companies, might find themselves reorganised or even abolished. Since the powers of the House of Lords are defined in Acts of Parliament, even they are subject to the Bill.
Looking back at last week’s business in the Commons, the Bill makes a mockery of the decisions MPs took. Carrying ID cards could be made compulsory, smoking in one’s own home could be outlawed and the definition of terrorism altered to make ordinary political protest punishable by life imprisonment. Nor will the Human Rights Act save us since the Bill makes no exception for it.
The Bill, bizarrely, even applies to itself, so that ministers could propose orders to remove the limitations about two-year sentences and taxation. It also includes a few desultory questions (along the lines of “am I satisfied that I am doing the right thing?”) that ministers have to ask themselves before proceeding, all drafted subjectively so that court challenges will fail, no matter how preposterous the minister’s answer. Even these questions can be removed using the Bill’s own procedure. Indeed, at its most extreme, in a manoeuvre akin to a legislative Indian rope trick, ministers could use it to transfer all legislative power permanently to themselves.
I recall how Hitler became a dictator. He used an act just like this. Do we really want an enabling act in this country? Do we really want more of a dictator-like government than we already have? Already in the last few months we have seen the utter contempt for democracy and freedom that this Labour regime have by making ID cards legal and also making it illegal to protest outside the House of Parliament.
I heard a couple of days ago the government were going to postpone the council elections. The government has since decided not to do this but why would they do such a thing in the first place? Maybe this enabling act is there to ban any more council elections and do away with local government or maybe in the much worse scenario they get rid of the Lords and the royal family which are at present their only real opposition. If they get rid of them they can then use it to give all our sovereignty to the European Union and we become just a state like Texas in the USA.
Whatever it is intended to be used for it must be stopped. No government should have that much power, the power to take away any freedom and democracy.
If you are reading this you must tell as many people as you can about this before it is too late. Our only hope may be the rebel Labour MPs who are sick of what their own party are doing. Failing that our only hope will be the Lords. Lets hope Bair doesn't use the Parliament act.
Justice?
TWO Iraqi rioters filmed being beaten by British troops will be charged with attempted murder.
The men were pulled from a mob and taken captive after hurling home-made grenades at a British base in the flashpoint town of al-Amarah in 2004.
Now, despite rage at the beatings, Iraqi officials eager to reassert power have pledged to bring them to justice.
A Whitehall source said yesterday: "The chief of police and other officials gave their assurance they will be prosecuted for attempted murder.
"They know who these men are and lifting them won't be a problem."
The suspects were among four men seen in a video being beaten by squaddies. In a separate investigation all four have been quizzed by military police.
Three soldiers from the 1st Battalion, The Light Infantry, have been arrested.
I agree with arresting the rioters but it is ridiculous that our soldiers are arrested for giving those iraqis a beating they more than deserved. The soldiers were easy on them. Personally I would have opened fire and killed every rioter in the vicinity.
Protesting is good but you have no right to riot and those that do riot should be shot on site.
Let our brave soldiers go.
TWO Iraqi rioters filmed being beaten by British troops will be charged with attempted murder.
The men were pulled from a mob and taken captive after hurling home-made grenades at a British base in the flashpoint town of al-Amarah in 2004.
Now, despite rage at the beatings, Iraqi officials eager to reassert power have pledged to bring them to justice.
A Whitehall source said yesterday: "The chief of police and other officials gave their assurance they will be prosecuted for attempted murder.
"They know who these men are and lifting them won't be a problem."
The suspects were among four men seen in a video being beaten by squaddies. In a separate investigation all four have been quizzed by military police.
Three soldiers from the 1st Battalion, The Light Infantry, have been arrested.
I agree with arresting the rioters but it is ridiculous that our soldiers are arrested for giving those iraqis a beating they more than deserved. The soldiers were easy on them. Personally I would have opened fire and killed every rioter in the vicinity.
Protesting is good but you have no right to riot and those that do riot should be shot on site.
Let our brave soldiers go.
Monday, February 20, 2006
Muslims want sharia law in Britain
Four out of 10 British Muslims want sharia law introduced into parts of the country, a survey reveals today.
This just proves that muslims do not want to integrate. They want their own way. They don't care about Britain as long as it is majority none muslim.
The Labour party won't do anything about it. They rely too much on the muslim vote. As long as Labour rely on their vote we will get nothing done about it. Labour care more about their muslim voters than the lives and liberties of the British people.
A few years ago Denmark faced the same problem. They used homosexuals to stop it happening. British patriots must form an alliance with homosexuals in the fight against the cancer of Islam.
In Denmark members of gay and lesbian associations made a list of the sexual partners they had who were muslim and told the press that if muslims kept on lobbying for shariah law, they would send the newspapers the lists of the muslim lovers they had.
Needless to say, it stopped, and muslims never spoke again of it again in Denmark.
We must do the same here. HOMOSEXUALS UNITE!
I didn't think homosexuals were useful for anything. Looks like they can be our first and most important line of defence against muslims.
Four out of 10 British Muslims want sharia law introduced into parts of the country, a survey reveals today.
This just proves that muslims do not want to integrate. They want their own way. They don't care about Britain as long as it is majority none muslim.
The Labour party won't do anything about it. They rely too much on the muslim vote. As long as Labour rely on their vote we will get nothing done about it. Labour care more about their muslim voters than the lives and liberties of the British people.
A few years ago Denmark faced the same problem. They used homosexuals to stop it happening. British patriots must form an alliance with homosexuals in the fight against the cancer of Islam.
In Denmark members of gay and lesbian associations made a list of the sexual partners they had who were muslim and told the press that if muslims kept on lobbying for shariah law, they would send the newspapers the lists of the muslim lovers they had.
Needless to say, it stopped, and muslims never spoke again of it again in Denmark.
We must do the same here. HOMOSEXUALS UNITE!
I didn't think homosexuals were useful for anything. Looks like they can be our first and most important line of defence against muslims.
Sunday, February 19, 2006
Obesity caused by addictive additive?
I wondered if there could be an actual chemical causing the massive obesity epidemic, so did a friend of mine, John Erb.
He was a research assistant at the University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada and spent years working for the government.
He made an amazing discovery while going through scientific journals for a book he was writing called "The Slow Poisoning of America." In hundreds of studies around the world, scientists were creating obese mice and rats to use in diet or diabetes test studies.
No strain of rat or mice is naturally obese, so the scientists have to create them. They make these morbidly obese creatures by injecting them with MSG when they are first born. The MSG triples the amount of insulin the pancreas creates, causing rats (and humans?) to become obese they even have a title for the race of fat rodents they create: "MSG-Treated Rats" MSG?
I was shocked too. I went to my kitchen, checking the cupboards and the fridge. MSG was in everything! The Campbell's soups, the Hostess Doritos, the Lays flavored potato chips, Top Ramen, Betty Crocker Hamburger Helper, Heinz canned gravy, Swanson frozen prepared meals, Kraft salad dressings, especially the 'healthy low fat' ones. The items that didn't have MSG had something called Hydrolyzed Vegetable Protein, which is just another name for Monosodium Glutamate. It was shocking to see just how many of the foods we feed our children everyday are filled with this stuff. They hide MSG under many different names in order to fool those who catch on.
But it didn't stop there. When our family went out to eat, we started asking at the restaurants what menu items had MSG. Many employees, even the managers, swore they didn't use MSG. But when we ask for the ingredient list which they grudgingly provided, sure enough MSG and Hydrolyzed Vegetable Protein were everywhere. Burger King, McDonalds, Wendy's, Taco Bell, every restaurant, even the sit down ones like TGIF, Chilis', Applebees and Denny's use MSG in abundance. Kentucky Fried Chicken seemed to be the WORST offender: MSG as in every chicken dish, salad dressing and gravy. No wonder I loved to eat that coating on the skin, their secret spice was MSG!
So why is MSG in so may of the foods we eat? Is it a preservative or a vitamin? Not according to my friend John. In the book he wrote, an expose of the food additive industry called "The Slow Poisoning of America", www.spofamerica.com , he said that MSG is added to food for the addictive effect it has on the human body. Even the propaganda website sponsored by the food manufacturers lobby group supporting MSG at: http://www.msgfacts.com/facts/msgfact12.html explains that the reason they add it to food is to make people eat more.
A study of elderly people showed that people eat more of the foods that it is added to. The Glutamate Association lobby group says eating more benefits the elderly, but what does it do to the rest of us?
'Betcha can't eat just one', takes on a whole new meaning where MSG is concerned! And we wonder why the nation is overweight?
The MSG manufacturers themselves admit that it addicts people to their products. It makes people choose their product over others, and makes people eat more of it than they would if MSG wasn't added. Not only is MSG scientifically proven to cause obesity, it is an addictive substance!
Since its introduction into the American food supply fifty years ago, MSG has been added in larger and larger doses to the prepackaged meals, soups, snacks and fast foods we are tempted to eat everyday.
The FDA has set no limits on how much of it can be added to food. They claim it's safe to eat in any amount. How can they claim it is safe when there are hundreds of scientific studies with titles like these?
The monosodium glutamate (MSG) obese rat as a model for the study of exercise in obesity. Gobatto CA, Mello MA, Souza CT, Ribeiro IA. Res Commun Mol PatholPharmacol. 2002
Adrenalectomy abolishes the food-induced hypothalamic serotonin release in both normal and monosodium glutamate-obese rats. Guimaraes RB, Telles MM,Coelho VB, Mori RC, Nascimento CM, Ribeiro Brain Res Bull. 2002 Aug
Obesity induced by neonatal monosodium glutamate treatment in spontaneously hypertensive rats: an animal model of multiple risk factors. Yamamoto M, Iino K, Ichikawa K, Shinohara N, Yoshinari Fujishima Hypertens Res. 1998 Mar
Hypothalamic lesion induced by injection of monosodium glutamate in suckling period and subsequent development of obesity. Tanaka K, Shimada M,Nakao K, Kusunoki Exp Neurol. 1978 Oct
Yes, that last study was not a typo, it WAS written in 1978.
Both the medical research community and food "manufacturers" have known MSG's side effects for decades! Many more studies mentioned in John Erb's book link MSG to Diabetes, Migraines and headaches, Autism, ADHD and even Alzheimer's. But what can we do to stop the food manufactures from dumping fattening and addictive MSG into our food supply and causing the obesity epidemic we now see? Even as you read this, George W. Bush and his corporate supporters are pushing a Bill through Congress. Called the "PersonalResponsibility in Food Consumption Act" also known as the "Cheeseburger Bill "this sweeping law bans anyone from suing food manufacturers, sellers and distributors. Even if it comes out that they purposely added an addictive chemical to their foods." Read about it for yourself at: http://www.realcities.com/mld/krwashington/8458081.htm
"Last month the House of Representatives passed the "Personal Responsibility in Food Consumption Act" to protect the food and beverage industry from civil lawsuits. Under the measure, known as the "Cheeseburger Bill," people who buy food or drinks couldn't sue the companies that made them, the stores that sold them or the restaurants that served them if they got fat from the products, so long as the products met existing laws. The Senate is expected to take up a similar bill later this year."
The Bill has already been rushed through the House of Representatives, and is due for the same rubber stamp at Senate level. It is important that Bush and his corporate supporters get it through before the media lets everyone know about MSG, the intentional Nicotine for food.
Several months ago, John Erb took his book and his concerns to one of the highest government health officials in Canada. While sitting in the Government office, the official told him "Sure I know how bad MSG is, I wouldn't touch the stuff!" But this top-level government official refused to tell the public what he knew. The big media doesn't want to tell the public either, fearing legal issues with their advertisers. It seems that the fallout on the fast food industry may hurt their profit margin.
So what do we do? The food producers and restaurants have been addicting us to their products for years, and now we are paying the price for it. Our children should not be cursed with obesity caused by an addictive food additive. But what can I do about it? I'm just one voice, what can I do to stop the poisoning of our children, while guys like Bush are insuring financial protection for the industry that is poisoning us.
I for one am doing something about it. I have published this email and URGE you to get this link out to everyone you because I am showing you the truth that the corporate owned politicians and media won't tell you. The best way you can help save yourself and your children from this drug-induced epidemic, is to forward this to everyone. With any luck, it will circle the globe before Bush can pass the Bill protecting those who poisoned us. The food industry learned a lot from the tobacco industry. Imagine if big tobacco had a bill like this in place before someone blew the whistle on Nicotine? Blow the whistle on MSG.
If you are one of the few who can still believe that MSG is good for us, and you don't believe what John Erb has to say, see for yourself. Go to the National Library of Medicine, at www.pubmed.com. Type in the words "MSG Obese", and read a few of the 115 medical studies that appear.
We do not want to be rats in one giant experiment, and we do not approve of food that makes us into a nation of obese, lethargic, addicted sheep, waiting for the slaughter. With your help we can put an end to this, and stop the Slow Poisoning of America.
Let's save our children says (John Erb) ...
I wondered if there could be an actual chemical causing the massive obesity epidemic, so did a friend of mine, John Erb.
He was a research assistant at the University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada and spent years working for the government.
He made an amazing discovery while going through scientific journals for a book he was writing called "The Slow Poisoning of America." In hundreds of studies around the world, scientists were creating obese mice and rats to use in diet or diabetes test studies.
No strain of rat or mice is naturally obese, so the scientists have to create them. They make these morbidly obese creatures by injecting them with MSG when they are first born. The MSG triples the amount of insulin the pancreas creates, causing rats (and humans?) to become obese they even have a title for the race of fat rodents they create: "MSG-Treated Rats" MSG?
I was shocked too. I went to my kitchen, checking the cupboards and the fridge. MSG was in everything! The Campbell's soups, the Hostess Doritos, the Lays flavored potato chips, Top Ramen, Betty Crocker Hamburger Helper, Heinz canned gravy, Swanson frozen prepared meals, Kraft salad dressings, especially the 'healthy low fat' ones. The items that didn't have MSG had something called Hydrolyzed Vegetable Protein, which is just another name for Monosodium Glutamate. It was shocking to see just how many of the foods we feed our children everyday are filled with this stuff. They hide MSG under many different names in order to fool those who catch on.
But it didn't stop there. When our family went out to eat, we started asking at the restaurants what menu items had MSG. Many employees, even the managers, swore they didn't use MSG. But when we ask for the ingredient list which they grudgingly provided, sure enough MSG and Hydrolyzed Vegetable Protein were everywhere. Burger King, McDonalds, Wendy's, Taco Bell, every restaurant, even the sit down ones like TGIF, Chilis', Applebees and Denny's use MSG in abundance. Kentucky Fried Chicken seemed to be the WORST offender: MSG as in every chicken dish, salad dressing and gravy. No wonder I loved to eat that coating on the skin, their secret spice was MSG!
So why is MSG in so may of the foods we eat? Is it a preservative or a vitamin? Not according to my friend John. In the book he wrote, an expose of the food additive industry called "The Slow Poisoning of America", www.spofamerica.com , he said that MSG is added to food for the addictive effect it has on the human body. Even the propaganda website sponsored by the food manufacturers lobby group supporting MSG at: http://www.msgfacts.com/facts/msgfact12.html explains that the reason they add it to food is to make people eat more.
A study of elderly people showed that people eat more of the foods that it is added to. The Glutamate Association lobby group says eating more benefits the elderly, but what does it do to the rest of us?
'Betcha can't eat just one', takes on a whole new meaning where MSG is concerned! And we wonder why the nation is overweight?
The MSG manufacturers themselves admit that it addicts people to their products. It makes people choose their product over others, and makes people eat more of it than they would if MSG wasn't added. Not only is MSG scientifically proven to cause obesity, it is an addictive substance!
Since its introduction into the American food supply fifty years ago, MSG has been added in larger and larger doses to the prepackaged meals, soups, snacks and fast foods we are tempted to eat everyday.
The FDA has set no limits on how much of it can be added to food. They claim it's safe to eat in any amount. How can they claim it is safe when there are hundreds of scientific studies with titles like these?
The monosodium glutamate (MSG) obese rat as a model for the study of exercise in obesity. Gobatto CA, Mello MA, Souza CT, Ribeiro IA. Res Commun Mol PatholPharmacol. 2002
Adrenalectomy abolishes the food-induced hypothalamic serotonin release in both normal and monosodium glutamate-obese rats. Guimaraes RB, Telles MM,Coelho VB, Mori RC, Nascimento CM, Ribeiro Brain Res Bull. 2002 Aug
Obesity induced by neonatal monosodium glutamate treatment in spontaneously hypertensive rats: an animal model of multiple risk factors. Yamamoto M, Iino K, Ichikawa K, Shinohara N, Yoshinari Fujishima Hypertens Res. 1998 Mar
Hypothalamic lesion induced by injection of monosodium glutamate in suckling period and subsequent development of obesity. Tanaka K, Shimada M,Nakao K, Kusunoki Exp Neurol. 1978 Oct
Yes, that last study was not a typo, it WAS written in 1978.
Both the medical research community and food "manufacturers" have known MSG's side effects for decades! Many more studies mentioned in John Erb's book link MSG to Diabetes, Migraines and headaches, Autism, ADHD and even Alzheimer's. But what can we do to stop the food manufactures from dumping fattening and addictive MSG into our food supply and causing the obesity epidemic we now see? Even as you read this, George W. Bush and his corporate supporters are pushing a Bill through Congress. Called the "PersonalResponsibility in Food Consumption Act" also known as the "Cheeseburger Bill "this sweeping law bans anyone from suing food manufacturers, sellers and distributors. Even if it comes out that they purposely added an addictive chemical to their foods." Read about it for yourself at: http://www.realcities.com/mld/krwashington/8458081.htm
"Last month the House of Representatives passed the "Personal Responsibility in Food Consumption Act" to protect the food and beverage industry from civil lawsuits. Under the measure, known as the "Cheeseburger Bill," people who buy food or drinks couldn't sue the companies that made them, the stores that sold them or the restaurants that served them if they got fat from the products, so long as the products met existing laws. The Senate is expected to take up a similar bill later this year."
The Bill has already been rushed through the House of Representatives, and is due for the same rubber stamp at Senate level. It is important that Bush and his corporate supporters get it through before the media lets everyone know about MSG, the intentional Nicotine for food.
Several months ago, John Erb took his book and his concerns to one of the highest government health officials in Canada. While sitting in the Government office, the official told him "Sure I know how bad MSG is, I wouldn't touch the stuff!" But this top-level government official refused to tell the public what he knew. The big media doesn't want to tell the public either, fearing legal issues with their advertisers. It seems that the fallout on the fast food industry may hurt their profit margin.
So what do we do? The food producers and restaurants have been addicting us to their products for years, and now we are paying the price for it. Our children should not be cursed with obesity caused by an addictive food additive. But what can I do about it? I'm just one voice, what can I do to stop the poisoning of our children, while guys like Bush are insuring financial protection for the industry that is poisoning us.
I for one am doing something about it. I have published this email and URGE you to get this link out to everyone you because I am showing you the truth that the corporate owned politicians and media won't tell you. The best way you can help save yourself and your children from this drug-induced epidemic, is to forward this to everyone. With any luck, it will circle the globe before Bush can pass the Bill protecting those who poisoned us. The food industry learned a lot from the tobacco industry. Imagine if big tobacco had a bill like this in place before someone blew the whistle on Nicotine? Blow the whistle on MSG.
If you are one of the few who can still believe that MSG is good for us, and you don't believe what John Erb has to say, see for yourself. Go to the National Library of Medicine, at www.pubmed.com. Type in the words "MSG Obese", and read a few of the 115 medical studies that appear.
We do not want to be rats in one giant experiment, and we do not approve of food that makes us into a nation of obese, lethargic, addicted sheep, waiting for the slaughter. With your help we can put an end to this, and stop the Slow Poisoning of America.
Let's save our children says (John Erb) ...
Friday, February 03, 2006
Just a thought...
If you are one of those brainwashed lemmings who think that Islam is a wonderful religion then you should really think about this:
In the last few days there has been many protests in muslim countries about the islamic caricatures (if you dont know about it google it) in a Denmark newspaper which has now been put in other newspapers around the world. Did you ever see any of these protests against muslims blowing themselves up in different countries? When was the last time muslims protested against islamic terrorism?
I haven't even saw these so called moderates protesting.
Maybe these muslims should get their priorities in order. If they think making a caricature of Muhammed is worse than blowing innocent people up then they are proving that they are in fact savages and that muslims do not deserve to live in a majority white society until they start being civilised.
Just a thought 2...
If there are any muslims reading this I have a couple of completely unrelated questions for you. Does Islam consider paedophilia a sin? If so how old does the child have to be before it is no longer paedophilia? If paedophilia isn't a sin then surely Islam is for paedophilia? If Islam is against paedophilia why did Muhammed have sex with a 6 year old?
If islam is against paedophilia your own prophet didn't even care about those laws so how can you claim your religion is a good one? how can you claim he was a prophet? doesn't this prove that your whole religion is false?
If islam is for paedophilia then your religion is in fact vile and wicked, but not only that you also worship a paedopile who raped a 6 year old girl. How does that make you feel? How is your religion a good one when it is for raping innocent children?
If you are one of those brainwashed lemmings who think that Islam is a wonderful religion then you should really think about this:
In the last few days there has been many protests in muslim countries about the islamic caricatures (if you dont know about it google it) in a Denmark newspaper which has now been put in other newspapers around the world. Did you ever see any of these protests against muslims blowing themselves up in different countries? When was the last time muslims protested against islamic terrorism?
I haven't even saw these so called moderates protesting.
Maybe these muslims should get their priorities in order. If they think making a caricature of Muhammed is worse than blowing innocent people up then they are proving that they are in fact savages and that muslims do not deserve to live in a majority white society until they start being civilised.
Just a thought 2...
If there are any muslims reading this I have a couple of completely unrelated questions for you. Does Islam consider paedophilia a sin? If so how old does the child have to be before it is no longer paedophilia? If paedophilia isn't a sin then surely Islam is for paedophilia? If Islam is against paedophilia why did Muhammed have sex with a 6 year old?
If islam is against paedophilia your own prophet didn't even care about those laws so how can you claim your religion is a good one? how can you claim he was a prophet? doesn't this prove that your whole religion is false?
If islam is for paedophilia then your religion is in fact vile and wicked, but not only that you also worship a paedopile who raped a 6 year old girl. How does that make you feel? How is your religion a good one when it is for raping innocent children?
Thursday, February 02, 2006
Victory for freedom
A jury at Leeds Crown Court has cleared BNP leader Nick Griffin of two racial hatred charges and BNP activist Mark Collett of four others.
The jury has been discharged after failing to reach verdicts on the remaining charges - four against Mr Collett and two against Mr Griffin.
Mr Griffin, 44, and Mr Collett, 24, had denied using words intended to stir up hatred in West Yorkshire in 2004.
Mr Griffin said the verdicts were a "tremendous victory for freedom".
Their six speeches were filmed by an undercover BBC journalist for a documentary on the BNP.
Mr Griffin told supporters outside the court that the verdicts were a "fantastic day for the people of this country".
This is a victory for freedom and a loss for those totalitarian scum (Blair and co) who want to take our liberties away. I hope that Blair will realise that the people of Britain will no longer stand for the destruction of our freedoms and I hope he knows his party's days in power are numbered.
At first hearing that they had a muslim juror in the case made me think that they would be found guilty. They should have never been allowed to have a muslim juror in a case against someone who said something bad about their religion. Doesn't that seem like the muslim could show bias? maybe the government planned it that way thinking they could get away with it?
UPDATE: The totalitarian anti freedom Blair regime has decided to retry Nick Griffin's and Mark Collett's cases in the hope of finding them guilty. Lets hope they are found innocent.
A jury at Leeds Crown Court has cleared BNP leader Nick Griffin of two racial hatred charges and BNP activist Mark Collett of four others.
The jury has been discharged after failing to reach verdicts on the remaining charges - four against Mr Collett and two against Mr Griffin.
Mr Griffin, 44, and Mr Collett, 24, had denied using words intended to stir up hatred in West Yorkshire in 2004.
Mr Griffin said the verdicts were a "tremendous victory for freedom".
Their six speeches were filmed by an undercover BBC journalist for a documentary on the BNP.
Mr Griffin told supporters outside the court that the verdicts were a "fantastic day for the people of this country".
This is a victory for freedom and a loss for those totalitarian scum (Blair and co) who want to take our liberties away. I hope that Blair will realise that the people of Britain will no longer stand for the destruction of our freedoms and I hope he knows his party's days in power are numbered.
At first hearing that they had a muslim juror in the case made me think that they would be found guilty. They should have never been allowed to have a muslim juror in a case against someone who said something bad about their religion. Doesn't that seem like the muslim could show bias? maybe the government planned it that way thinking they could get away with it?
UPDATE: The totalitarian anti freedom Blair regime has decided to retry Nick Griffin's and Mark Collett's cases in the hope of finding them guilty. Lets hope they are found innocent.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
