Food shortages in Africa
The world is trying to make the West feel sorry for Africa again but we should not feel guilty for anything. It is their own fault that they are starving.
UN food agency chief Jacques Diouf moaned that billions are being wasted on feeding obese people in the West while millions starve around the world. Mr Diouf should realise that these people wouldn’t be starving if they stopped popping another kid out every chance they got. They would probably have enough food to go around if they just had 2 children to feed instead of a dozen.
If the population of the planet keeps on rising there is of course going to be more famines and more people will starve. To deal with the increasing population UN chief Ban Ki-moon has said that world food production must rise by 50% by 2030 to meet increasing demand but the thing is there will be more people who will require more living space and they will have to get it from somewhere. Undeveloped areas would have to be built on with houses but these areas could also be used for farms.
World food production won’t rise anywhere near as significantly as they want it to because it just can’t unless GM crops are used and even then it will still be difficult and it will be even more difficult in Britain as we will have less farms than we do already. We will then have to rely on foreign countries for our own food.
Countries like Ethiopia who have just received £10m in aid from us should be told they will not get anymore aid unless they put in population control measures to reduce their birthrate. Reducing their birthrate should be a condition of receiving anymore aid. If they don’t do it they will be told that they can starve the next time there is a famine in their country.
Showing posts with label white guilt. Show all posts
Showing posts with label white guilt. Show all posts
Saturday, June 14, 2008
Saturday, August 20, 2005
Racial differences
For decades liberals have been saying that the races are just the same under the skin and call people racist who say they are wrong.
I am here to prove that they are wrong and race is not just skin deep. The following "article" probably won't be that good as I have so many facts that it might make it look sloppy so sorry in advance.
Recently it has come to light in the news that only 1% of organ donors are black. Why is this a problem if we are all the same? surely we can share our organs? Apparent not because transplant success is helped if the donor and recipient are from the same ethnic background. So now we find out that we can't even have the same organs eventhough we are supposed to be the same. How surprising is that.
Thats not all their are more physical differences like that. For example blood group B is more commonly found in black African/Caribbean populations and U negative - a rare sub-group - is only found in these communities.
In addition, 25% of Asians are blood group B compared to 9% of western Europeans.
So as well as having organs that we can't transplant into different races the majority of the time we can't share blood with other races too.
This is not all. Black people have a special talent, a talent for sports. It is a fact that in most of the 15 most common running events common running events, from 100 meters to the marathon, every world record is now held by an African or someone of African descent African descent.
In baseball, basketball and football, blacks are represented in numbers far greater than their share of the population, and many, if not most, of the superstars are black.
In sports we now have facts that show whites are inferior to blacks at sport but if you are white don't be so glum because black have the least intelligence. On IQ test scores the average for a black person is 85. The average for a white person is 100 and the average for an oriental is 106. You can see the differences for everything in the table here.
The table shows black people have a higher chance of having twins while orientals have the least chance of having twins. Black people also have higher hormone levels which may be responsible for them wanting sex more which makes them more prone to AIDs. Infact black people have on average 3 to 19 percent more testosterone than white men but that could be just because they have larger sexual organs which makes them have sex more often. The higher testosterone may be the cause of their higher aggressiveness which may be the cause of their high crime rate
Also as we can see from the table that I provided earlier skeletal development is earlier for black people and longer for orientals. This shows that black people heal far quicker however black people also have the shortest life span. There is more at the table if you look.
It is interesting to know that race differences show up early in life. Black babies are born a week earlier than White babies, yet they mature faster as measured by bone development. By age five or six, Black children excel in the dash, the long jump, and the high jump, all of which require a short burst of power. By the teenage years, Blacks have faster reflexes, as in the famous knee-jerk response.
Blacks also have from 3 to 19% more of the sex hormone testosterone than Whites or Orientals. This means more explosive energy, which gives Blacks the edge in sports like boxing, basketball, football, and sprinting.
On average, Black children are born with smaller brains than White or East Asian children. Pointing this out is not constructing stereotypes, it is simply observing facts as they are. Both science and justice call for us to seek and tell the truth, not to tell lies and spread error.
In summary, the same racial pattern would not occur so consistently all around the world and over time if race were a mere social construct. If it were a meaningless construct, it would have no power to predict phenomena like brain size, growth rate, life span, crime, and family stability. Other evidence also shows that race is a biological reality. For example, coroners in crime labs can identify race from a skeleton or even just the skull. They can even identify race from blood, hair, or semen. How could they do this if race was only a social construct? The scientific evidence shows that the politically correct mantra “race is just skin deep” is a case of deep denial.
We should stop denying each race is different and embrace our strengths and weaknesses as even if we are physically weak we are intelligent and if we are intellectually weak we are strong. We should embrace these facts about us before racists hijack them. In the end if liberals do not admit the differences racists will hijack the facts and the people willturn to them for telling the truth.
For decades liberals have been saying that the races are just the same under the skin and call people racist who say they are wrong.
I am here to prove that they are wrong and race is not just skin deep. The following "article" probably won't be that good as I have so many facts that it might make it look sloppy so sorry in advance.
Recently it has come to light in the news that only 1% of organ donors are black. Why is this a problem if we are all the same? surely we can share our organs? Apparent not because transplant success is helped if the donor and recipient are from the same ethnic background. So now we find out that we can't even have the same organs eventhough we are supposed to be the same. How surprising is that.
Thats not all their are more physical differences like that. For example blood group B is more commonly found in black African/Caribbean populations and U negative - a rare sub-group - is only found in these communities.
In addition, 25% of Asians are blood group B compared to 9% of western Europeans.
So as well as having organs that we can't transplant into different races the majority of the time we can't share blood with other races too.
This is not all. Black people have a special talent, a talent for sports. It is a fact that in most of the 15 most common running events common running events, from 100 meters to the marathon, every world record is now held by an African or someone of African descent African descent.
In baseball, basketball and football, blacks are represented in numbers far greater than their share of the population, and many, if not most, of the superstars are black.
In sports we now have facts that show whites are inferior to blacks at sport but if you are white don't be so glum because black have the least intelligence. On IQ test scores the average for a black person is 85. The average for a white person is 100 and the average for an oriental is 106. You can see the differences for everything in the table here.
The table shows black people have a higher chance of having twins while orientals have the least chance of having twins. Black people also have higher hormone levels which may be responsible for them wanting sex more which makes them more prone to AIDs. Infact black people have on average 3 to 19 percent more testosterone than white men but that could be just because they have larger sexual organs which makes them have sex more often. The higher testosterone may be the cause of their higher aggressiveness which may be the cause of their high crime rate
Also as we can see from the table that I provided earlier skeletal development is earlier for black people and longer for orientals. This shows that black people heal far quicker however black people also have the shortest life span. There is more at the table if you look.
It is interesting to know that race differences show up early in life. Black babies are born a week earlier than White babies, yet they mature faster as measured by bone development. By age five or six, Black children excel in the dash, the long jump, and the high jump, all of which require a short burst of power. By the teenage years, Blacks have faster reflexes, as in the famous knee-jerk response.
Blacks also have from 3 to 19% more of the sex hormone testosterone than Whites or Orientals. This means more explosive energy, which gives Blacks the edge in sports like boxing, basketball, football, and sprinting.
On average, Black children are born with smaller brains than White or East Asian children. Pointing this out is not constructing stereotypes, it is simply observing facts as they are. Both science and justice call for us to seek and tell the truth, not to tell lies and spread error.
In summary, the same racial pattern would not occur so consistently all around the world and over time if race were a mere social construct. If it were a meaningless construct, it would have no power to predict phenomena like brain size, growth rate, life span, crime, and family stability. Other evidence also shows that race is a biological reality. For example, coroners in crime labs can identify race from a skeleton or even just the skull. They can even identify race from blood, hair, or semen. How could they do this if race was only a social construct? The scientific evidence shows that the politically correct mantra “race is just skin deep” is a case of deep denial.
We should stop denying each race is different and embrace our strengths and weaknesses as even if we are physically weak we are intelligent and if we are intellectually weak we are strong. We should embrace these facts about us before racists hijack them. In the end if liberals do not admit the differences racists will hijack the facts and the people willturn to them for telling the truth.
Thursday, July 28, 2005
White guilt
White christians have been given white guilt through the years because of all the atrocities that we supposedly did such as slavery, colonialism and the holocaust but I will prove that the information that we have been told is not fully true or it has been blown out of proportion by the liberals who want whites to feel guilty for what our ancestors may have done.
Slavery
What we have been lead to believe is untrue. We have been lead to believe that white Christians began slavery which was not the case. White christians didn't even want africans to be brought back as slaves. It was the Jews. No I am not an antisemite. All you have to do is look at the facts.
The fact is large numbers of free Negroes owned black slaves; in fact, in numbers disproportionate to their representation in society at large. In 1860 only a small minority of whites owned slaves. According to the U.S. census report for that last year before the Civil War, there were nearly 27 million whites in the country. Some eight million of them lived in the slaveholding states.
The census also determined that there were fewer than 385,000 individuals who owned slaves (1). Even if all slaveholders had been white, that would amount to only 1.4 percent of whites in the country (or 4.8 percent of southern whites owning one or more slaves).
According to federal census reports, on June 1, 1860 there were nearly 4.5 million Negroes in the United States, with fewer than four million of them living in the southern slaveholding states. Of the blacks residing in the South, 261,988 were not slaves. Of this number, 10,689 lived in New Orleans. The country's leading African American historian, Duke University professor John Hope Franklin, records that in New Orleans over 3,000 free Negroes owned slaves, or 28 percent of the free Negroes in that city.
To return to the census figures quoted above, this 28 percent is certainly impressive when compared to less than 1.4 percent of all American whites and less than 4.8 percent of southern whites. The statistics show that, when free, blacks disproportionately became slave masters.
The majority of slaveholders, white and black, owned only one to five slaves. More often than not, and contrary to a century and a half of bullwhips-on-tortured-backs propaganda, black and white masters worked and ate alongside their charges; be it in house, field or workshop. The few individuals who owned 50 or more slaves were confined to the top one percent, and have been defined as slave magnates.
In 1860 there were at least six Negroes in Louisiana who owned 65 or more slaves The largest number, 152 slaves, were owned by the widow C. Richards and her son P.C. Richards, who owned a large sugar cane plantation. Another Negro slave magnate in Louisiana, with over 100 slaves, was Antoine Dubuclet*, a sugar planter whose estate was valued at (in 1860 dollars) $264,000 . That year, the mean wealth of southern white men was $3,978.
In Charleston, South Carolina in 1860 125 free Negroes owned slaves; six of them owning 10 or more. Of the $1.5 million in taxable property owned by free Negroes in Charleston, more than $300,000 represented slave holdings . In North Carolina 69 free Negroes were slave owners.
In 1860 the Negro William Ellison was South Carolina's largest slaveowner.
Interestingly, considering today's accounts of life under slavery, authors Johnson and Roak report instances where free Negroes petitioned to be allowed to become slaves; this because they were unable to support themselves.
Further more it was these black slave magnates that were the biggest abusers of slaves.
Whilst the White man sat and ate at the same table as his slaves it was the black man that used the bullwhip.
As you can see it was not us whites that had the most slaves. Per capita blacks were more likely to own slaves. Black people should be the ones getting blamed for having slaves and not the white people.
*After the civil war Antoine Dubuclet served Louisiana as state treasurer from 1868 to 1878, the only negro in the reconstructed South to hold that office for more than one term.
Yes, that is right, after the civil war, and years before the 'civil rights movement' blacks held high office which just shows that even the south wasn't that racist. It shows that If blacks deserved it they got to where they wanted to be, well unless they were owned by another black guy.
You are probably thinking this is irrelevant as you probably think whites were the people who started the slave trade, well you couldn't be more wrong. I don't blame you. Since 1945 we have had constant antiwhite propoganda.
How do I know this? well it is basic stuff. Haven't you been told that Egypt had slaves which was thousands of years before whites owned them?
Now for slavery in modern times which is creating this white guilt. In Africa the tribes had been fighting other tribes for centuries and taking slaves.
Many people credit Bartolome De Las Casas as being the father of slavery. This would be a ridiculous statement at the best of times, as slavery has existed since the dawn of time, and still exists in Africa today, but even if we allow for a statement saying that Bartolome De Las Casas was the father of modern slavery, or slavery in the Americas, we still have a difficulty there.
Bartolome De Las Casas actually often spoke on behalf of non-whites rights. This is recorded in In 1516 when Las Casas returned to Spain to plead the Indians' case with King Ferdinand V.
Following service in New Spain (Mexico), Nicaragua, Peru and Guatemala, he obtained an audience with Charles V. The result of that meeting was promulgation of the Nuevas Leyes de 1542, which dealt a severe blow to the encomienda. Unfortunately, these laws were repeatedly flouted by greedy settlers.
Who were the these settlers though? well by the mid-sixteenth century there were more secret Jews than Catholics in Mexico City.
Bartolome De Las Casas failed in his proposals to introduce blacks as free laborers, not slaves, because of other 'spanish' settlers in the new world, the jewish ones of Mexico city and elsewhere.
As well as the settlers the scheme also failed because of problems at the other end.
When Bartolome De Las Casas first advocated free black labor in the Americas there were a number of black christian converts in Portuguese catholic missions in the country now known as Mozambique who voluntered to work in the new world, but the jewish traders refused to transport them saying they would only transport slaves.
Slavery would not have existed in the Americas without the jews, and yet you hate the White man for this trade.
By the way, while we are talking about Whites and slavery, it's also worth remembering that between 1530 and 1780 more than a million White Europeans were enslaved by North African slave traders so don't be blaming whites for slavery. Even if we did it wouldn't it be fair as whites were taken first?
Ever since Slavery was ended white people have faced blacks that have continually demanded compensation. Even if it was only whites that owned slaves it would only be the rich that actually owned them which would only be a tiny minority of people so why should blacks be given compensation for what a minority of ancestors did? They shouldn't be given a thing. The fact of the matter is the african was better off as a slave than dying in diseased africa.
It is afact that the majority of black slaves were sold into slavery by their own kind. They were captured when opposing tribes fought and were sold as slaves.
Not once is the whiteman to blame. Blacks are the first to blame because they were the ones that captured them first. Jews are the second to blame because they began the modern slave trade.
Whites did not invent slavery, they did not capture or imprison the slaves, they did not sell them, nor transport them, and proportionately they wern't even the greatest owners, but they did free them. Blacks should not be moaning at us. They should be thanking us. Without the whiteman they would never be free today.
So how can we be blamed for their 'suffering' whites took them in, housed them, fed them, clothed them, educated them and in return they expected them to work. Is that such a bad deal?
Maybe now it's time for the black race to repay the white man, not only for all these years of abuse and claims, over things we didn't do, not only to repay the unfairly claimed payments of compensation and welfare, but also to pay the debt of liberation.
If you read this spread the word. If you are blamed for slavery tell them the facts. Don't point them to this blog. Tell them to research it themselves or they will never know if you just tell them. Provide the links but that is it.
The holocaust
For years the jews and liberals have been trying to make whites feel sorry for the jews because of the holcaust. I will give you a reality check. They don't deserve our sympathy. So 6 million jews died. Far more none jews died in the second world war than that so why should we feel sorry for them? The answer is we shouldn't but liberal brainwashing has made us to it. Don't believe me? Then why do we have a holocaust memorial day? its to make us think about the minority that died. Most people don't know that they were a minority though. Most people don't realise that the jews barely just made 10% of the deaths.
It is a fact that communism killed far more people than fascism. Russian communism killed 94 million in peacetime.
We must blame political correctness for white guilt here. Another fact is political correctness was started by communism . We already know that the British government is infiltrated by communists if you see my other articles therefore they are doing this on purpose for some unknown reason. If we tried to have a day dedicated to the people killed by communism we would be ridiculed because they are communists.
There should be no holocaust memorial day. In its place we should have a genocide memorial day. A day dedicated to all genocides including the communist and holocaust genocides.
The jews don't deserve a day of their own to commemorate the dead especially if we also have to commemorate their dead and no one elses.
Colonialism
We have been lead to believe that colonialism harmed the countries that was colonised. This is false. If it did why are Canada, America and Australia such good places to live compared to everywhere else? This is because Africa was a hell hole before colonisation and we made it a little better. If it wasn't for us the native people would have never been able to take advantage of their resources. It is a myth that Africa is a poor continent. It is a fact that Africa is rich in precious rocks and other things. Without the whiteman they would have never known it existed so they would be living worse than they are today. They should be thanking us for showing them ways to take advantage of their resources.
When the Zaire (now called the Democratic Republic of the Congo) became independent in early 1960, it possessed 60,000 km of tarred roads. Today it has less than 9,000 km of tarred roads left. Good roads were one of the things that were left to them after colonialism and look what they did to that.
It is a fact that colonialism gave Africa the ability to speak english, law was also given and the colonies were built up so that the inhabitants wold have a better standard of living. Also near the end of the British empire the colonies as a whole were costing more money than they were making which would mean that Britain were helping the inhabitants a lot and what do the africans do? They go and screw it up. Africa has received half a trillion in aid despite the fact that the World Bank has reported that “Econometric analyses show that aid has no systematic relationship to growth anywhere in the world. This may not be surprising in countries where aid is small relative to the size of the economy. It is surprising and concerning in Africa—where aid flows have consistently reached 10% or more of gross national product in many countries over an extended period of time.”
The fact is we helped africa progress and now the white man isn't there they are screwing up everything we did for them. Aid is not making their situation any better. Africa is hopeless. We should just leave them alone and allow them to progress how they want to. That will probably make them regress for a few decades but that can't be avoided. Colonialism can only be blamed for progressing african nations. Perhaps the progress was too fast for them which is why we should leave them lone and let them progress their own way without any aid at all. They should finally be made to stand on their own two feet.
Conclusion
White people should not feel guilty for anything. The fact is we helped the world. Is it our fault that the africans are too stupid that they are regressing? If they don't want to be our colonies they should be made to stand on their own two feet without anymore aid as we have to be cruel to be kind in this instance.
As for the jews the next one you see that moans about the holocaust justy tell him to shut up and tell him that they weren't the only ones that suffered. Infact they were a minority.
I hope I have cleared somethings up for you and hope you will stop this political correctness and stop going to holocaust rememberance celebrations or whatever. Don't do a minutes silence for the jews. They don't deserve it. Don't donate money for live 8. The africans don't deserve it and it does little good. It might do good for the short term however if you keep donating they will expect to be fed by us constantly and won't even try to make africa a better place which will make africa a forever hell hole. Do you want them to stay that way? If you don't then don't donate to them. Its only going to make matters worse. They have to learn to progress.
White christians have been given white guilt through the years because of all the atrocities that we supposedly did such as slavery, colonialism and the holocaust but I will prove that the information that we have been told is not fully true or it has been blown out of proportion by the liberals who want whites to feel guilty for what our ancestors may have done.
Slavery
What we have been lead to believe is untrue. We have been lead to believe that white Christians began slavery which was not the case. White christians didn't even want africans to be brought back as slaves. It was the Jews. No I am not an antisemite. All you have to do is look at the facts.
The fact is large numbers of free Negroes owned black slaves; in fact, in numbers disproportionate to their representation in society at large. In 1860 only a small minority of whites owned slaves. According to the U.S. census report for that last year before the Civil War, there were nearly 27 million whites in the country. Some eight million of them lived in the slaveholding states.
The census also determined that there were fewer than 385,000 individuals who owned slaves (1). Even if all slaveholders had been white, that would amount to only 1.4 percent of whites in the country (or 4.8 percent of southern whites owning one or more slaves).
According to federal census reports, on June 1, 1860 there were nearly 4.5 million Negroes in the United States, with fewer than four million of them living in the southern slaveholding states. Of the blacks residing in the South, 261,988 were not slaves. Of this number, 10,689 lived in New Orleans. The country's leading African American historian, Duke University professor John Hope Franklin, records that in New Orleans over 3,000 free Negroes owned slaves, or 28 percent of the free Negroes in that city.
To return to the census figures quoted above, this 28 percent is certainly impressive when compared to less than 1.4 percent of all American whites and less than 4.8 percent of southern whites. The statistics show that, when free, blacks disproportionately became slave masters.
The majority of slaveholders, white and black, owned only one to five slaves. More often than not, and contrary to a century and a half of bullwhips-on-tortured-backs propaganda, black and white masters worked and ate alongside their charges; be it in house, field or workshop. The few individuals who owned 50 or more slaves were confined to the top one percent, and have been defined as slave magnates.
In 1860 there were at least six Negroes in Louisiana who owned 65 or more slaves The largest number, 152 slaves, were owned by the widow C. Richards and her son P.C. Richards, who owned a large sugar cane plantation. Another Negro slave magnate in Louisiana, with over 100 slaves, was Antoine Dubuclet*, a sugar planter whose estate was valued at (in 1860 dollars) $264,000 . That year, the mean wealth of southern white men was $3,978.
In Charleston, South Carolina in 1860 125 free Negroes owned slaves; six of them owning 10 or more. Of the $1.5 million in taxable property owned by free Negroes in Charleston, more than $300,000 represented slave holdings . In North Carolina 69 free Negroes were slave owners.
In 1860 the Negro William Ellison was South Carolina's largest slaveowner.
Interestingly, considering today's accounts of life under slavery, authors Johnson and Roak report instances where free Negroes petitioned to be allowed to become slaves; this because they were unable to support themselves.
Further more it was these black slave magnates that were the biggest abusers of slaves.
Whilst the White man sat and ate at the same table as his slaves it was the black man that used the bullwhip.
As you can see it was not us whites that had the most slaves. Per capita blacks were more likely to own slaves. Black people should be the ones getting blamed for having slaves and not the white people.
*After the civil war Antoine Dubuclet served Louisiana as state treasurer from 1868 to 1878, the only negro in the reconstructed South to hold that office for more than one term.
Yes, that is right, after the civil war, and years before the 'civil rights movement' blacks held high office which just shows that even the south wasn't that racist. It shows that If blacks deserved it they got to where they wanted to be, well unless they were owned by another black guy.
You are probably thinking this is irrelevant as you probably think whites were the people who started the slave trade, well you couldn't be more wrong. I don't blame you. Since 1945 we have had constant antiwhite propoganda.
How do I know this? well it is basic stuff. Haven't you been told that Egypt had slaves which was thousands of years before whites owned them?
Now for slavery in modern times which is creating this white guilt. In Africa the tribes had been fighting other tribes for centuries and taking slaves.
Many people credit Bartolome De Las Casas as being the father of slavery. This would be a ridiculous statement at the best of times, as slavery has existed since the dawn of time, and still exists in Africa today, but even if we allow for a statement saying that Bartolome De Las Casas was the father of modern slavery, or slavery in the Americas, we still have a difficulty there.
Bartolome De Las Casas actually often spoke on behalf of non-whites rights. This is recorded in In 1516 when Las Casas returned to Spain to plead the Indians' case with King Ferdinand V.
Following service in New Spain (Mexico), Nicaragua, Peru and Guatemala, he obtained an audience with Charles V. The result of that meeting was promulgation of the Nuevas Leyes de 1542, which dealt a severe blow to the encomienda. Unfortunately, these laws were repeatedly flouted by greedy settlers.
Who were the these settlers though? well by the mid-sixteenth century there were more secret Jews than Catholics in Mexico City.
Bartolome De Las Casas failed in his proposals to introduce blacks as free laborers, not slaves, because of other 'spanish' settlers in the new world, the jewish ones of Mexico city and elsewhere.
As well as the settlers the scheme also failed because of problems at the other end.
When Bartolome De Las Casas first advocated free black labor in the Americas there were a number of black christian converts in Portuguese catholic missions in the country now known as Mozambique who voluntered to work in the new world, but the jewish traders refused to transport them saying they would only transport slaves.
Slavery would not have existed in the Americas without the jews, and yet you hate the White man for this trade.
By the way, while we are talking about Whites and slavery, it's also worth remembering that between 1530 and 1780 more than a million White Europeans were enslaved by North African slave traders so don't be blaming whites for slavery. Even if we did it wouldn't it be fair as whites were taken first?
Ever since Slavery was ended white people have faced blacks that have continually demanded compensation. Even if it was only whites that owned slaves it would only be the rich that actually owned them which would only be a tiny minority of people so why should blacks be given compensation for what a minority of ancestors did? They shouldn't be given a thing. The fact of the matter is the african was better off as a slave than dying in diseased africa.
It is afact that the majority of black slaves were sold into slavery by their own kind. They were captured when opposing tribes fought and were sold as slaves.
Not once is the whiteman to blame. Blacks are the first to blame because they were the ones that captured them first. Jews are the second to blame because they began the modern slave trade.
Whites did not invent slavery, they did not capture or imprison the slaves, they did not sell them, nor transport them, and proportionately they wern't even the greatest owners, but they did free them. Blacks should not be moaning at us. They should be thanking us. Without the whiteman they would never be free today.
So how can we be blamed for their 'suffering' whites took them in, housed them, fed them, clothed them, educated them and in return they expected them to work. Is that such a bad deal?
Maybe now it's time for the black race to repay the white man, not only for all these years of abuse and claims, over things we didn't do, not only to repay the unfairly claimed payments of compensation and welfare, but also to pay the debt of liberation.
If you read this spread the word. If you are blamed for slavery tell them the facts. Don't point them to this blog. Tell them to research it themselves or they will never know if you just tell them. Provide the links but that is it.
The holocaust
For years the jews and liberals have been trying to make whites feel sorry for the jews because of the holcaust. I will give you a reality check. They don't deserve our sympathy. So 6 million jews died. Far more none jews died in the second world war than that so why should we feel sorry for them? The answer is we shouldn't but liberal brainwashing has made us to it. Don't believe me? Then why do we have a holocaust memorial day? its to make us think about the minority that died. Most people don't know that they were a minority though. Most people don't realise that the jews barely just made 10% of the deaths.
It is a fact that communism killed far more people than fascism. Russian communism killed 94 million in peacetime.
We must blame political correctness for white guilt here. Another fact is political correctness was started by communism . We already know that the British government is infiltrated by communists if you see my other articles therefore they are doing this on purpose for some unknown reason. If we tried to have a day dedicated to the people killed by communism we would be ridiculed because they are communists.
There should be no holocaust memorial day. In its place we should have a genocide memorial day. A day dedicated to all genocides including the communist and holocaust genocides.
The jews don't deserve a day of their own to commemorate the dead especially if we also have to commemorate their dead and no one elses.
Colonialism
We have been lead to believe that colonialism harmed the countries that was colonised. This is false. If it did why are Canada, America and Australia such good places to live compared to everywhere else? This is because Africa was a hell hole before colonisation and we made it a little better. If it wasn't for us the native people would have never been able to take advantage of their resources. It is a myth that Africa is a poor continent. It is a fact that Africa is rich in precious rocks and other things. Without the whiteman they would have never known it existed so they would be living worse than they are today. They should be thanking us for showing them ways to take advantage of their resources.
When the Zaire (now called the Democratic Republic of the Congo) became independent in early 1960, it possessed 60,000 km of tarred roads. Today it has less than 9,000 km of tarred roads left. Good roads were one of the things that were left to them after colonialism and look what they did to that.
It is a fact that colonialism gave Africa the ability to speak english, law was also given and the colonies were built up so that the inhabitants wold have a better standard of living. Also near the end of the British empire the colonies as a whole were costing more money than they were making which would mean that Britain were helping the inhabitants a lot and what do the africans do? They go and screw it up. Africa has received half a trillion in aid despite the fact that the World Bank has reported that “Econometric analyses show that aid has no systematic relationship to growth anywhere in the world. This may not be surprising in countries where aid is small relative to the size of the economy. It is surprising and concerning in Africa—where aid flows have consistently reached 10% or more of gross national product in many countries over an extended period of time.”
The fact is we helped africa progress and now the white man isn't there they are screwing up everything we did for them. Aid is not making their situation any better. Africa is hopeless. We should just leave them alone and allow them to progress how they want to. That will probably make them regress for a few decades but that can't be avoided. Colonialism can only be blamed for progressing african nations. Perhaps the progress was too fast for them which is why we should leave them lone and let them progress their own way without any aid at all. They should finally be made to stand on their own two feet.
Conclusion
White people should not feel guilty for anything. The fact is we helped the world. Is it our fault that the africans are too stupid that they are regressing? If they don't want to be our colonies they should be made to stand on their own two feet without anymore aid as we have to be cruel to be kind in this instance.
As for the jews the next one you see that moans about the holocaust justy tell him to shut up and tell him that they weren't the only ones that suffered. Infact they were a minority.
I hope I have cleared somethings up for you and hope you will stop this political correctness and stop going to holocaust rememberance celebrations or whatever. Don't do a minutes silence for the jews. They don't deserve it. Don't donate money for live 8. The africans don't deserve it and it does little good. It might do good for the short term however if you keep donating they will expect to be fed by us constantly and won't even try to make africa a better place which will make africa a forever hell hole. Do you want them to stay that way? If you don't then don't donate to them. Its only going to make matters worse. They have to learn to progress.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
