Terrorists allowed to stay

Sometimes our judges should be shot for the stupid decision which they make. Abu Qatada won’t be deported to Jordan where he is wanted on terror charges. He should be deported. It is irrelevant what that country’s criminal justice system is like. At the very least he should be rotting in prison for encouraging terrorism against people who don’t believe in Islam.

Another terrorist will also soon be released even though at one stage he was one of our most wanted terrorists. What exactly is the government doing allowing these scum to live in the country they hate?

It isn’t all bad news. Abu Hamza is finally going to be deported to America where he will face trial and hopefully the rest of his life in prison.

Are there 2000 terrorists?

The government doesn’t seem to be able to agree on the amount of terrorists in this country. In May 2007 MI5 said there were 2000 terrorists in Britain. Lord Stevens the former Metropolitan Police Commissioner disagreed and said it was closer to 4000.

A few days ago Gordon Brown makes a speech saying that the security services are monitoring 2000 terror suspects in the UK. It’s been over a year between MI5 claiming their amounts and Gordon Brown making his speech. Are we supposed to believe that the numbers of terrorists have remained static? I don’t believe that for one minute. Either our government is hiding the real numbers or the security services are too incompetent to arrest a decent number in one year. I don’t think it would be hard to arrest 300-400 of them particularly if they were actually terrorists.

This kind of makes a mockery of the government claim they need more time to hold terrorist suspects when it looks like they haven’t even made a move on any terrorists that they have been monitoring. Thank god the House of Lords might overturn the 42 day detention bill.

Government win 42 day detention

There are advantages and disadvantages of the government winning the 42 day detention vote. The disadvantage is that they can keep you without charge for 42 days. No government should be allowed to do that. If the suspects are guilty they should be charged. If there is a lot of evidence to sift through then the government should provide whatever manpower is needed.

If you were innocent you would want compensation if they kept you for this long which is why I am happy to see that the government have promised to give £3000 compensation per day to anyone not charged after 28 days.

If the government were actually serious about dealing with terrorism they would pour more resources into dealing with terrorism and not lock you up for 42 days without charge. They would also stop leaving sensitive information lying around on trains. Such incompetence should not be tolerated and anyone doing so should be sacked.

Iraq to free 6000 insurgents

The job of our military in Afghanistan is about to get harder. While our troops were taking part in anti-insurgent activities they were arresting many suspected insurgents, 6000 of who will now be released from prison and will probably start fighting our troops again.

I bet our troops are glad that they are over there especially when the people they have already arrested for fighting them will probably start fighting them again.

Afghan troops face new enemy

Taliban fanatics have been making "hate calls" to the UK homes and relatives of soldiers serving in Afghanistan.

Senior commanders believe they get the numbers either by monitoring troops' mobile phone calls or from staff at Afghan phone companies.

The wife of one RAF officer was told: "You'll never see your husband alive - we have just killed him."

It was some hours before officials could confirm that her husband was still safe and well. All troops serving in southern Afghanistan have now been banned from carrying mobile phones.

Soldiers in Iraq can keep their phones but have been warned to keep their use to a minimum.

This is bad and it is about to get a lot worse for our soldiers in Afghanistan because the Taliban are teaching children as young as 6 to kill our soldiers. I don’t know about our soldiers but I wouldn’t relish the thought of killing someone so young and brainwashed.

Police want unlimited detention without trial

Police chiefs are demanding the power to lock up terror suspects indefinitely, it has emerged.

Reopening the debate over detention without trial, the Association of Chief Police Officers (Acpo) called for some suspects to be held for "as long as it takes".

Acpo president Ken Jones said police were struggling to operate within the 28-day limit, stressing the global scale of terror investigations and the need to arrest suspects early.

"We are now arguing for judicially supervised detention for as long as it takes," he told the Observer.

"We are up against the buffers on the 28-day limit.

"We understand people will be concerned and nervous, but we need to create a system with sufficient judicial checks and balances which holds people, but no longer than a day necessary."

The idea is said to have been discussed with Prime Minister Gordon Brown, who has signalled his intention to re-visit the subject of detention without trial this year.

Gordon Brown should not give them this right. If they were guilty they should be sent to trial. They should not be sent to prison forever just because they suspect they might be guilty of something.

I am even iffy about the 28 day period. I am not sure it should even be that long but I definitely think locking people up forever without trial is unnecessary. If they are guilty they should prove it in a court of law with a jury finding them guilty.

24% of terror suspects are asylum seekers

THE government faces new embarrassment over Britain’s porous borders with the revelation that one in four terrorist suspects arrested in Britain is an asylum seeker.

Since the attacks of September 11, 2001, there have been more than 1,100 arrests under antiterrorism legislation. While some of the most serious threats come from Al-Qaeda supporters born in the UK, there is new evidence of many suspects exploiting loopholes in the country’s immigration laws.

It was confirmed last week that Muktar Said Ibrahim, one of the bombers involved in the failed suicide attacks of July 21, 2005, was given a passport even though he had convictions for indecent assault and robbery. Gordon Brown has said an applicant in similar circumstances would not now be granted citizenship.

This is certainly a reason to keep our asylum system going seeing as a significant proportion of terror suspects are asylum seekers. I have something I have noticed that could mean it is even more. When their applications are accepted they are no longer called asylum seekers. I wonder what percentage of these terror suspects have been given indefinite leave to remain?

Surely this should be a reason to close our boarders and tell the asylum seekers that if they wanted asylum they should have went to the nearest safe country to their own and not passed sometimes over a dozen countries just to get to Britain.

Human shields thwart Israel

The Israelis are far too merciful when dealing with terrorist scum. Yesterday it was reported that they called off a planned air attack on a house in Jabaliya refugee camp in Gaza after hundreds of Palestinians formed a human shield to protect the house of a terrorist leader.

Today they announced they are reviewing their advanced warnings after that incident. Good on them too. You don’t tell terrorists what you are going to do and you certainly don’t call it off when they get terror sympathisers to be human shields. You blow up their houses with all the human shields.

In the coming weeks when Israel does this kind of thing again there will be mass outrage (mainly from the BBC) because this time they won’t give any advanced warning and people will die who they weren’t targeting. Those that die will only have their own kind to blame though as it was their fault. When this mass outrage happens I will be here to point out this story again and show my readers that Israel tried to do everything to limit civilian casualties but the Palestinians forced them into it.

Terrorist should have been sent packing

The scrounging assylum seekers that ripped the British tax payer off for tens of thousands of pounds and commited the 21/7 bomb attack are still on the run. Witnesses say that they returned to their flat and they may have got more explosives and could be planning more attacks.

The fact that Muktar Said Ibrahim (one of the bombers) was allowed to stay in this country even after spending 2 years in jail is an absolute disgrace. Assylum seekers that commit even the smallest crimes should immediately be sent back however Muktar Said Ibrahim was given citizenship and tens of thousands of pounds in benefits which he no doubt sent to alqaeda.

I see no benefit in keeping assylum seekers that commit crimes here. They hate our ways so should be sent on the first plane back to where they came from.

The only way that we can defend ourselves from future attacks is by closing our boarders and not allowing anymore in. Assylum seekers should go to the first safe country if they want safety. This is never Britain so we should close our boarders to assylum seekers too. This may seem harsh but I thought they wanted safety and not a cruise half way around the world? If they actually want safety why not go to the first safe country?

Those assylum seekers already here should be sent back when their country becomes safe again. It is irrelevant how long they have been here. If they have been here 5 minutes or 25 years they should be sent back when their country is safe. No exceptions.

London terror attacks

A couple of hours ago London was hit by a terror attack. It wasn't as deadly as the one two weeks ago but it shows that Blair cannot handle what is going on.

Its time to get tough on these guys. Simply putting them in jail is not good enough. I think we will all agree to that unless you are mentally retarded. The punishments for terrorism should be extremely harsh. As a punishment they should be tortured 3 days per week for as long as their sentence is for. After their sentence they should then be killed and then cremated with a pig. That way they would not be able to get into heaven so they will no longer do it.

Suicide bombers should get a similar sentence, because they are already dead their remains should be put in a bag and cremated inside a pig. The only reason they commit terror is to get into paradise and they can't if they have touched a pig.

Its time we started doing these harsh punishments as normal punishments aren't working.