Sunday, December 17, 2006

Britons to be punished for not being slaves


Work-shy Britons are in danger of losing out to a new wave of industrious eastern European immigrants over jobs, a cabinet minister will warn this week as he launches a controversial review of benefits.

John Hutton, the Work and Pensions Secretary, will argue that, with 600,000 vacancies nationwide, there should be jobs for most of those who want them. And he will say that a 'can work, won't work' minority who refuse to take up opportunities will be targeted in the review, which could lead to tougher sanctions against those judged not to be co-operating with efforts to find employment.

Hutton's attack follows complaints from a number of Labour MPs that the influx of eastern Europeans following EU expansion two years ago has undercut wages and cost jobs among British-born workers, particularly in industries such as construction, where Polish plumbers and carpenters have proved both cheap and popular with householders.

Maybe there wouldn’t be so many unemployed if immigrants weren’t undercutting wages so much. Brits shouldn’t be made to work as slaves just so the rich can get richer. If you want them to get back to work you send ALL immigrants back which will allow Brits to work for a fair wage and not the crappy wages that are being offered now.

After you have got rid of the immigrants then you can penalise the work shy because then they will actually be work shy. Start with giving unemployment benefit to those people that have worked for atleast 2 years then by giving them a time limit on unemployment benefit for 3 months. Once the three months are up do not give them financial benefits. Give them tokens for food and other necessities. If you want luxuries you should have to work. Having to pay for things in tokens will shame people into getting a job as it will be embarrassing having to pay with tokens. If they haven’t found a job within another 6 months the government should find them 4 different jobs to pick from. If they decline all of them their benefits will be stopped and if they want to eat they should have to work for it. I don’t see why the state should provide for you when you are unwilling to provide for yourself. It might harm their children if they have any but children that have parents that cannot take care of them (provide food and other necessities) should be taken into care and given food and other necessities.

1 comment:

alanorei said...

"If any would not work, neither should he eat" AV1611, St Paul, 2 Thessalonians 3:15b, circa 50 AD originally.

P.S. For info. (i.e. not discussion, as the blog has moved on) Mel Phillips has a useful article on the legalisation of brothels issue.

http://www.melaniephillips.com/
articles-new/?p=473