Monday, July 30, 2007

Asylum seekers paid to go home then come back


HUNDREDS of failed asylum-seekers who were paid to leave
Britain have sneaked back—with many now demanding the handout AGAIN.

Almost 400 of the 5,000 refugees booted out last year with business grants of up to £3,500 in their pockets are known to have returned.

Two-thirds have now been told they can STAY. But the rest want a SECOND handout at British taxpayers' expense.

We were told this was happening in March but nothing has been done. At that time there were about 300 that came back. The government could have done something about that other 100 when they were informed by the newspapers but they haven’t done anything.

3 comments:

Bag said...

lrybdmhYou might save more than you think because no one is going to do it for £13K I would think.

I don't believe that is the way to go either. I think judges are well out of touch in general and the whole area needs an overhaul.

i don't think juries should be deciding sentences either. It should be on a defined scale with sentences being defined for each crime up front so everyone knows what the punishement is.

youdontknowme said...

I think you got the wrong blog entry but heres my response:


You might save more than you think because no one is going to do it for £13K I would think.

Those leaving college who don't want to go to university might. They are also going to get more money the more experienced they are.


i don't think juries should be deciding sentences either. It should be on a defined scale with sentences being defined for each crime up front so everyone knows what the punishement is

I think there should be some leeway though and the only way for this to be taken into effect is if the jury decide.

Bag said...

Sorry about that.Must have clickedon the wrong link again.

I understand what you are saying but I believe justice should be blind. For arguments sake if prosecution for being a member of a legal political party is on the cards then everyone who is a member of any legal political party should be prosecuted. If it is left up to a jury then they will taint it with their feelings for that party.

It should be automated. The only difference should be is there are other options. for example a charge of murder. the person may be guilty of killing someone but murder No. An option for unlawfulkilling with a reduced sentence should be automatically considered which it is not now.

Still think that if you want goodpeople on these panelsyou need more money.