February 2007 roundup

At the start of the month the EU decided that anyone questioning their version of history will be sent to prison. We all loved the EU after that especially when we found that 20% of new homebuyers were Polish which is pushing house prices up.

Bulgarialikes the EU though. They celebrated joining it by pardoning 1,500 criminals and scrapping 80,000 pending trials. Maybe those were the Bulgarians which came over here and started pick pocketing?

If only we could have a referendum but the EU doesn’t like referendums. Just as well for the EU seeing as they are trying to do away with countries and their pesky foreign policies

The immigration crisis got worse than it was before when it was revealed that Immigration Detention Centres are so full that they can’t round up anymore immigrants and send them home. We should just send all the immigrants home if they are a burden on us. Poland does it so why not us?

Britain was found to be the most burgled country in Europe. This is bad especially seeing as how all our prisons are full and the European Union will soon be making it illegal to pick flowers. We thought we could count on new prison places but we can’t sadly

Seeing as the justice system wasn’t doing a good enough job the BNP started their own patrols and were criticised for it. The patrols were a good thing seeing as how the police are overburdened with paperwork and it doesn’t matter anyway because some criminals get to go free even though they have committed a crime.

An illegal immigrants escaped justice and got to keep £13,000 of what he defrauded the government. The illegal immigrant wasn’t even deported but maybe the government didn’t know where he was? They don’t seem to have a clue how many legal immigrants are here.

The government showed their contempt for people when they decided to ignore more than 1 million petitioners and go ahead with road pricing anyway. They couldn’t do much anyway seeing as it was an EU directive. Teenagers could see that Blair couldn’t care less about the country and decided that they won’t be voting for Blair. Blair doesn’t care. He is planning to evict 3 million who don’t vote for him.

The government tried to get the nation dependent on them so that they would vote for them and they are succeeding with already one third of the nation dependent on them. Labour was probably trying to create a ‘Can’t be arsed to work’ attitude and it looks like in some parts of the country they were successful.

In some areas they are so desperate to cling on to power that they are gerrymandering so they have people that will actually vote for them.

As the government destroyed the military the head of the navy appealed for funds as they needed billions more. You would think the government would have enough money from getting £45 billion from drivers. Maybe we have to wait for them to tax peace and quiet before the navy get the money? Maybe they will do it by getting the coastguard to fine sailors for smoking on their own boats?

Muslims were out again making demands on schools to do things their way even if that school wasn’t Islamic.

Labour: vote for us or suffer

Billions of pounds in public money have been systematically channelled to Labour strongholds over the past decade, detailed research reveals.

Some of the startling findings of the research include:

• More than 90 per cent of social security jobs relocated from London have gone to Labour constituencies.

• National Lottery grants to constituencies represented by members of the Cabinet are nearly double those to seats held by the Shadow Cabinet.

• More than 70 per cent of community hospitals earmarked for closure are in Tory seats.

• More than 70 per cent of new hospitals being built are in Labour seats.

• Police forces in Labour-controlled areas top the funding league, while those in opposition areas come bottom.

• Post office cuts and rail station closures are overwhelmingly in opposition seats.

Blair is basically saying “vote for us or suffer”. They couldn’t care less about Britain. All they care about is votes and staying in power to inflict more damage to Britain. If you care more about this country than yourself you should NEVER vote Labour. They have shown time and time again what a corrupt lot of lying twats they are.

Hat tip: Ellee Seymour.

Vote Labour or else

Remember in September of last year when it was revealed that Labour are giving better healthcare funding to constituencies that vote for them?

Well now it has emerged that they also get better education and environmental funding so Blair is basically saying vote for us or you can die and remain an uneducated worker with no chance of making it out of minimum wage.

It is disgraceful that none labour constituencies are being cheated out of billions of pounds just because they won’t vote for Labour and his band of merry criminals.

Attention all Sheeple!

When will the fools in government learn that Islam is a violent faith not fit for these lands? A better question should be when will the sheeple stop voting for the fools in government? Just because your dad voted Labour doesn’t mean your right for voting present day Labour. It just makes you a stupid sheeple. The last time a British political party did anything good for the people was when Attlee gave us the NHS and that’s the last thing.

If you actually cared about this country you would never even think about voting Labour especially after finding out there are thousands of British Islamic terrorists just waiting to attack this country.

You can count on Blair and his criminal cronies to do nothing to stop anymore plane loads of potential terrorists coming into this country as that would damage their terrorist bloc vote.

Wake up people! When will you realise that the ‘big three’ political parties are filled with traitors and criminals ready to criminalise all dissent? Stop voting Labour, Conservative and Liberal and start voting BNP to get this country back on track. If you loved your country you would vote BNP. A vote for Labour is a vote for more terrorism, not to mention it’s just plain stupid.

September 2007 monthly roundup

Global warming fanatics have been saying for years that there is a global warming consensus between the scientists of the world. It turns out that the consensus does not exist and 500 scientists have their doubts about global warming.

In Croydon the Muslims sneakily opened a mosque after sending a planning application for a doctor’s surgery. The application was accepted and then the Muslims turned it into a mosque. I wonder if this mosque is controlled by the hardline Islamic movement which controls half the mosques in this country.

Businesses in this country have begun appeasing Islam. Greggs has decided that they are going to install an Islamic toilet at their headquarters even though they don’t have any Muslims.

I think that failed asylum seekers should have no choice but to leave. The government don’t think that because they have bribed 30% of failed asylum seekers to leave.

Polish people just aren’t cheap enough for our government anymore and they aren’t pricing enough Brits out of the workplace which is why the government are trying to attract Indians to come to this country. The government is trying to look like they are tough on immigration which is why they have said that they are going to reduce immigration from none EU countries. I don’t believe it because they said they would do the same thing last year. We do need to get a hold of immigration because they are putting financial pressure on councils.

Immigrants are no longer taking the jobs of our low paid workers. They are taking the jobs of our doctors too. Never fear, the government is to publish their analysis on immigration.

Foreign criminals who have committed crimes in this country have been allowed to stay in this country. A Pakistani businessman escaped prison and deportation after committing a string of sexual offences. Another man, Michal Kwidzinski escaped deportation after he raped a barmaid after only being in the country a week.

Immigration does have some benefits. Sadly none of those benefits are for us. In Romania, crime has gone down. That’s because all their criminals are over here in London which is shown by the fact that 20% of crime in London is caused by foreigners.

Things are getting so bad with immigration that even a leftwing think tank thinks immigration is bad.

Crime isn’t just about immigration. We have our own thugs and scumbags, 3000 of which are under the age of criminal responsibility. Sometimes they don’t arrest people because the victims go after the criminals and get their property back. I just wish we could get our money back from benefit cheats but unfortunately that doesn’t happen. If only we could send Harriet Harman prison too but then again we can’t even send sex offenders to prison.

This month prison officers decided to stage a strike. This upset many people including sex offenders who were given compensation for their good behaviour. In a bid to stop the feeling of criminals being hurt those on community service are to be barred from wearing fluorescent jackets because people might call them names.

Even the police are getting in on crime. In Worcester they have been allowed to nick your bike if you don’t lock it up. It’s to stop crime you see. Not to worry. Some criminals are getting back at the cops and nicking police bikes. Police aren’t really there to stop crime anymore. They don’t even tell the truth in FoI requests even though they spend most of their time on doing paperwork. Imagine how much paperwork would be generated if those 5 million unsolved crimes were actually solved.

If you are unlucky enough to be arrested for fraud and you are innocent you won’t have the benefit of a jury trial for very long.

It seems as if failing anti racism tests is no longer a big deal and will not stop you from entering the police force. Some black police aren’t happy about this though.

The smoking ban was again causing stupid decisions to be made. This time police will have to have no smoking signs on their cars even if they are undercover police. London underground even had to replace their no smoking signs because they didn’t comply with the law anymore.

The Junior Doctor crisis could continue for many years because of government incompetence.

The Conservatives have finally had a good idea. They have decided to keep failing pupils back for a year so that they can catch up to their peers. Unfortunately they have let themselves down to pander to the Muslims.

The liberal democrats finally had a few good ideas too. They want to increase personal responsibility by charging drunks for their own treatment. Unfortunately they came up with some daft policies and scored an own goal over the EU and then alienated half a million people and then booed a UKIP speaker because he told the truth.

It seems like you can’t even discipline children in school anymore even if they are very disruptive. If you do then you might have to write a grovelling letter of apology. If our schools provided decent education our universities wouldn’t have to provide grammar lessons.

Our troops have been fighting and dying in Iraq. Sometimes our soldiers arrest the insurgents. It turns out that was a bad idea because the Iraqi government has decided to release 6,000 insurgents from prison. Our government is also betraying our soldiers because they are considering giving asylum to an afghan even though he fought against our troops.

The wars that we are in are costing us a lot of money which is why the government is selling off some of our embassies to pay for the security of our embassies in war zones. If they stopped paying billions on consultants they would probably have the money which they probably could spend on military bases which are run down and which soldiers shouldn’t have to live in. In one base in the war zones they never had a doctor for three weeks even though they were coming under constant attacks.

The government decided that they wanted to create Citizens juries which are going to be useless and are just a PR stunt. If Gordon Brown was really in favour of democracy then he would give us more referendums and he would stop penalising communities which don’t vote Labour. He also wouldn’t be trying to silence civil servants, film makers and blackmailing local councils.

The government isn’t the only one silencing critics. Alisher Usmanov, an Uzbek billionaire didn’t like what a blogger said about him so he closed his blog down as well as a few other blogs. The CRE also don’t like the fact that someone started a petition over gipsies.

The government were again penalising children for being white and banning white councillors from meetings to promote the interests of none whites. Is it any wonder Britain is more divided than ever?

Eastbourne Borough Council isn’t the smartest run council in the country. They decided to close down 4 playgrounds and then when the children had nothing to do they decided to pay £80,000 to teach children to play.

Tessa Jowell knew that the bill for the Olympics would rise but lied to us. It rose because they were spending over the odds on many areas including paying people £400 per hour to attend planning meetings. They are also paying gipsies to move so they can start building for the Olympics. The gipsies of course wanted more money and they received it. The Olympic bosses are also paying staff up to £1,200 per day.

The Red Arrows are banned from the Olympics for being too British even though the event is held in Britain.

In Scotland the SNP were getting ready to discriminate against English students while they treat immigrants and asylum seekers better. It would seem that the SNP are worse than Labour. They threw a dinner party at taxpayers’ expense and charging people to speak to their leader.

Gordon Brown would like to spend your money giving better healthcare to foreign countries. They may as well come here afterall immigrants go to the front of the queue for NHS treatment.

The EU has once again been in the news. This time people from EU countries will be able to come here and claim free healthcare. This will of course overwhelm the NHS especially if they allow people from countries outside the EU to come here too.

References to the Queen may be scrapped under new EU rules and replaced with a paragraph from the new treaty. They also want us all to have our own identity card. Thank god atleast one village had a referendum on the EU treaty which they voted for in a landslide.

My policies

If I was prime minister I would do the following. Please comment and criticise the policies as you see fit


1. There would be a new minimum wage for big business only. The minimum wage for big business would be different for each city and would be calculated like this:

Average weekly rent
Average weekly power bill
Average weekly food bill for family of 4
plus 25%

So you find what the weekly bills are (see above) plus 25% then divide it by 48 (which is the minimum hours people should work per week) and you have the minimum hourly wage.


The 25% bit would be for entertainment or putting some away in the bank.

The minimum wage for small business would be the national average or 15% lower than big business if the national average is more in that city than the city minimum wage.


This would allow small businesses to compete with big business and workers wouldn't be exploited because they would be getting a fair wage.

Of course this new system could give less than the old in some places.



2a. A flat tax of about 25% would be taken for everyone earning £15,000 per year or more. This would fluctuate depending on how many children you have if you are living with your children. Those who don't live with their children won't receive the benefits

2b. For every child you have (and you are living with) your flat tax will decrease by 3% up until the 5th child. The percentage will increase to 4.5% for every child under 3.

2c. Mixed race relationships would not get this.

This would be good for many things. Parents would be encouraged to live together because if they don't one won't receive the benefits of the tax system. This would stop children only living with one parent which I think might decrease youth crime. This might also cure decreasing birth rates for europeans and more importantly get more money for pensions (if they don't have children that money will go to pensions more. the more children they have the more they can pay into the benefits system).

This would also decrease mixed race relationships which are nothing more than ethnic cleansing of whites.


3. There will be a comsumption tax on none essential goods.

This would be good because it would encourage people to save for a rainy day and it would decrease waste.


4a. The BBC license fee would be abolished but the BBC would remain under state contol. They would have to get funding from advertisers.

This would be good because I think the state should have its own tv channel but people shouldn't have to have a license for a tv.


5. Car licenses would be abolished.

People shouldn't be forced to have to have a license to own a car


6. Introduce a special ‘level playing field' super tax on companies that evade paying other taxes in Britain by out-sourcing jobs to factories and call centres overseas. If they want to do business here, they must pay their full share of taxes here.

This would make them employ people here if they want to do business here.


7. There will be tariffs on foreign made goods that Britain can produce itself unless the foreign goods are already more expensive.

This would get our supermarkets to employ people in this country and allow our businesses to be on a fair playing field.


8a. Leave the EU

I think Britain should govern their own affairs.

8b. On all present EU projects already completed there will be a sign saying how much it cost the EU, how much we have given to the EU since we joined, how much we gave in that particular year and the Union jack and the flag of whatever country of the UK the EU project was in.

This would stop EU subliminal advertising which is apparent to only a few of us.


9. Leave Nato

Our soldiers should not be killed in foreign wars.


10. There will be a new bill of rights guaranteeing freedom of speech, freedom of opinion, freedom of worship and other basic freedoms. The race relations act would then be abolished and so would the religious hate bill.


11a. The voting system would be changed but not into proportional representation (I don't like it). If the party in government gets 33% of the vote they can push through 66% of their policies (% of vote x 2) without citizen interference. Once they reach their limit the other policies will have to be voted on by the people. To stop parties just announcing hundreds of things that they will do so it will neverend so they don't have to call an election the last 6 months of their term will be devoted to referendums. Whatever they couldn't push through during their term will have to be pushed through in 6 months.

To stop the government making us vote often (sooner or later people just won't care) only a maximum of 2 referendums a month will be made and changes to laws would have to be sent to citizens who would be given a minimum of 1 day for every 3000 words to read what it is before they go to vote.

11b. This would mean that a manifesto becomes a contract. Whatever they promise to do they must try and do it. The things that they want to change will be numbered. The first number will be the first thing to start and will go on like that. This would be to ensure that the goverenment couldn't pick and choose and so that the electorate know the priorities of that political party.

This would be good because at present the governments have far too much power.

11c. In case of an emergency the government can call a legislative emergency which would give them powers to deal with the emergency (the emergency could be as simple as the murder rate has significantly increased but it can only be used if people are getting hurt). During the legislative emergency they are not allowed to take our rights away

11d. There would be a citizens referenda based on the swiss model. Citizens could get a petition going to change things like laws. The petition would need 60,000 signatures or 0.1% of the population. Once it has the number of signatures there will be a national referendum.

11e. To boost election turnout voting over the internet will be allowed however you will need your voter ID and your national insurance number to prove who you are. Other personal questions will also be asked. To know who you voted for you will receive a receipt a couple of days later incase it was someone else who voted.

11f. Postal votes will be banned except for the long term sick, disabled and elderly.

11g. Ban the conducting or publishing of opinion polls in the last three weeks of an election campaign.

11h. Trade unions would be banned from giving money to political parties.

11i. No political party may accept donations from the same person/corporation totalling more than £50,000 per year.

11j. For every MP a party has in the house of commons they will receive £2000 and free mail advertising in the constituencies they control.

11k. Our colonies (how many do we have?) will be invited to send a representative to the house of commons to act as their MP.


12. There will be an English parliament (not the UK parliament) sitting at westminister.

This is so england can be like the other countries in the uk so the others don't feel special.


13A. Conscription would be brought back. Once turning 18 they would have to join the armed forces for 1 year. Alternatively they can help the community for two years however they will not be entitled to a free university education, will not benefit from the child flat tax reduction, will not be able to own a gun and won't be able to vote in the citizens referenda or put their name down on the petition for it. If they do not do the community one they will not be allowed to vote at all or drive a vehicle.

13B. Having completed their tour in the armed forces they will be allowed to carry a rifle at home in case an intruder brakes in.


14a. Our military will be brought home from every single foreign country they are in and made to protect our boarder until the immigration task force is up to the job.

14b. All illegal immigrants will be found and deported. If they do not tell us where they are from we will pay the poorest countries in the world to take them. There will be no appeals.

14c. Asylum seekers will be sent home if their country is deemed safe.

14d. We will take no more refugees and will abide by he 1951 United Nations Convention on Refugees so unless there is a civil war in france no asylum seeker will be our problem.

14e. All legal immigrants and descendents of immigrants from 1930 onwards will be afforded the chance to go to the country they or their descendents came from. They will also receive generous financial incentives to leave.


15. Abolish quotas and targets for ethnic representation in all areas of employment, public and private. They will only be allowed to get a job based on ability and skill and not ethnicity.


16a. The hijab and burqua will be banned in all public places including mosques.

16b. No more mosques will be allowed to be built.

16c. The present Qu'ran will be banned from being sold and being in mosques and will be replaced with a British version with the offending passages either removed or edited.

16d. Muslims will be treated like they would treat Dhimmis except they can run for office.


17. All saints of the british isles will be made national holidays.


18a. Corporal and capital punishment will be back. Capital punishment will only be used if DNA evidence or video evidence is used to prove the guilt and it will only be used for drug dealing, paedophilia and murder.

18b. Repeat offenders will be deported if they are a descendent of an immigrant that came here after 1930. Their families will be offered a chance to go with them.

18c. Prisoners will receive visits once per month that last 10 minutes and visitors will not be allowed to tell them any news about what is going on in the outside world unless it is to do with family or friends.

18d. No newspapers will be allowed into prisons and they will receive no news about what is going on in the outside world.

18e. News channels will not be allowed on prison TVs.

18f. The sentences that prisoners receive will be the minimum amount of time they get. Once the minimum time is up they will go to a prisons board to decide if they have reformed. If they have then they will be let go. if not or they have committed crimes whilest they were in jail they will be held for an extra 6 months then go to the board again.

18g. If prisons become overpopulated the ones who have committed the most serious crimes will be deported and lose citizenship as long as they have served atleast 50% of their sentence.


19. Abortions will be legal but harder to get. The time limit will be 20 weeks and it will not be paid for on the NHS unless there is a serious problem.


20. Healthcare professionals and teachers will be given free mortgages where their skills are needed. They will also be given free places for their children in creches. Their wages will also be increased by 50%

21. To deal with superbugs we will do what the dutch do and put beds in giant disinfectant things (don't know what they are called but they work) atleast once per week. Matron will also make a comeback.

22. Have a referendum on euthanasia.

23a. Starting from 6 years old children will learn 1 language per year and if they show promise they can carry it on for two years. The first language will be sign language then gaelic, welsh or irish, then french, german or dutch, then chinese, russian or arabic. If all those languages are learned they will then be taught morse code.

23b. In english they will be taught about english poetry and english stories

23c. In history they will be taught about british history and the world wars and will listen to churchill and hitler speeches.

23d. There will be a new lesson called Conspiracy Theories that will be taught for one hour per week. The children will not be told if the conspiracies are wrong but will be encouraged to make up their own minds instead of being told the answer. They will receive arguments for and against the conspiracy

23e. In wood tech they will be taught to make crossbows, bows and arrow and other weapons made from wood.

23f. In PE they will be taught to use bows and arrows and crossbows to hit a moving and none moving target.

(23e and 23f are incase society suddenly brakes down from something like the peak oil crisis and they have to hunt for their own food).

24. Teachers should be trained in atleast two subject including english, maths or science.

25. Races would be taught in separate classes with a teacher that is of the same race whenever possible. This is not racist as studies have proven black children learn better through a hands on approach to education and it would be racist to teach them in a none black way. Just because they are taught in separate classes does not mean they will be taught in separate schools. if children wish they can socialise with other races at break and at dinner time.

26. The railways, RNLI, energy industry, pharmaceutical industry and other needed industries will be nationalised.

27. Reduce fuel tax

28. Ban out of town shopping centres-they encourage car dependence

29. Have variable speed limits on motorways at the discression of the local police force.

30. Instead of subsidising food quantity we will subsidise food quality.

31. Halal meat will be banned

32. Mandatory foreign aid will be stopped. Citizens will then be able to volunteer to give an extra percentage of income in taxes. 60% of which will go to the Adopt a country project. The rest will be saved incase there is a disaster like an earthquake. The adopt a country money will be put into a pot to upgrade one country at a time over a couple of decades. Only democratic and free countries will be considered. This aid will be given on a consultant basis. We will tell them what to spend it on. If they won't spend it on what we want them to spend it on they don't get it. This will be used to make the country better and if it works we will go to the UN and ask all first world countries to do the same on a country of their choice.

33. Only houses with more than one bedroom will be allowed to be built and people will get points based on their circumstances. Once a house is free the one with the most points in that area will be offered it. The points will be graded as followed (this doesn't include bungallows):

Born in country=100
In a same race hetero sexual relationship=50
Can trace ancestry in country back to atleast 1930 on atleast one side of family=40
Living with a child=5 per child
Teacher, health professional, police, firebrigade=4 per year of service
Served in the military=5 per year of service
Prepared to share house with someone=11 (this will allow less homes to be built if people are willing to go into a shared home sceme and will only be open to single people and they will not have a choice of who they are with).
Voted in elections or referendums=2 per election and 1 per referendum.
Served jury duty=3 per times served
Employed=10
Lived in same home=1 per month of living in that homes
Commit a crime=lose half the points that you have


This would rightfully give homes to people born in this country and who can trace their ancestry back to the 1930s and would encourage people to have children. This would also discourage mixed race relationships and homosexuality and rightfully give points to those professions that have helped the country the most eventhough most probably own their own homes.
Instead of living on your own this would discourage you to do that so more homes won't have to be built which destroys the environment.
This would also encourage people to vote at election time and do jury duty and rightfully give homes to those who are working and take away points for people who have committed a crime.
This would award points to people who have done the least moving house.



34. Seeing how so many politicians are traitors they will have to say the following Oath before they run for election:

I hereby solemnly swear that I will defend the freedoms and interests of the British people and put British interests before party loyalty.


As well as that they will have to take a lie detector test three weeks before they election. They will be asked if:

They will defend the interests of the British people
They will defend the freedoms of the British people
They will put British interests before party loyalty


Their answers will be put on the news and the ballot papers near their name so the constituents will know if they are lying.



35. Politicians would be entitled to be paid on a performance basis and this is how:


First time MPs-This would be defined as the first time they won an election in their constituency. Winning the constituency then losing a constituency then winning it again would count as a first time MP:

Find the GDP per capita minus the wealth of the top 1% earners. That would be their yearly income entitlement.


Second time MPs-This would be defined as winning an election in a constituency three times in a row:

Find the GDP per capita minus the wealth of the top 1% earners then double the amount.


Even more wins would increase income by 10% for every election in their constituency they win.

*Those on the winning party would get 5% extra than those that are on the same level.
*Those in the Cabinet would get 10% extra than those on the same level.
*The Prime minister would get 20% extra than those on the same level.


Also just because they are entitled to it doesn't mean they will get it. They will get a percentage of it based on how much time is spent at parliamentary debates and on other jobs that is in a politicians job description. This will be modified for cabinet members. Cabinet members' will be classed as present at parliamentary debates and other jobs if they are on official business like a foreign secretary might be in a foreign country.

This would include the expenses that they receive. If they are only doing their job 15% of the time they will only get 15% of the expenses which they claim. The new expense system would not include stationary, costs of staff wages and computer equipment as they would be reimbursed for 100% of it.

This will mean that if an MP is entitled to £50,000 and he only shows up to parliamentary debates 10% of the time he will only be given £5,000.

All this would make MPs do their jobs better and actually turn up to debates and votes especially if they would face not being paid.

This would mean Tony Blair our Prime minister wouldn't get paid much at all as he has only attended 14% of all votes in parliament. Imagine if he was out in the real world and he only attended work 14% of the time. He would be fired and rightfully so.


This would be a good idea because their income would be based on performance. If they do a good job then they will receive more money.



36. Newspapers would be nationalised. There would then be two newspapers which would be tabloids and broadsheets. A tabloid newspaper and a broadsheet newspaper would be set up for the United Kingdom. Citizens would then elect an editor for the United Kingdom newspapers. Then citizens of each of the countries of the United kingdom would elect one for each of the newspapers who would just do news in the respective countries. They would then do the same for regions and cities.

The editors would be encouraged to make it work because they would receive 25% of the profits. They would be given a price range that they must keep the price of the newspapers in. As well as receiving 25% of the profits if they succeed they will lose money if they don't succeed. If they run into a deficit it will come out of their money.

Editors will be elected once per year.

As well as doing that for newspapers the same will be done for the news channels except the people will be paid a fixed amount and the only people that can be elected for this position are the broadsheet editor and the tabloid editor.

Private newspapers will be allowed to see their papers only two days per month which will be chosen by each editor. Private channels will be allowed 5 mins per day for news and a full day once per month chosen by the tv editor.

Private newspapers and tv news channels will only be allowed to be owned by British citizens.

This would bring to a halt the brainwashing done by the newspapers.

August 2007 monthly roundup

Crime is out of control and the government has no idea how to solve it. The only thing they are doing is releasing criminals early or tagging criminals even though 50% of criminals re-offend.

The government seems to be inconsistent when it comes to their drugs policy. Last month he was considering whether to reclassify cannabis then he slashed the drugs rehab budget and then the government decided that they should stop daily prison checks.

In today’s crime ridden country it’s never a good idea to stick up for yourself or stick up for those weaker than yourself. This has been shown on many occasions. On one occasion a man confronted a burglar who entered his home. The burglar fell to his death and the man was arrested. If the man killed him then he did a public service especially considering that the burglar was on bail for committing a similar crime.

A warden was arrested after he confiscated a bicycle from teenage yobs. Police also arrested a rail guard for confronting a drunken hooligan who was threatening passengers. He was then sacked by his company and he now can’t pay the mortgage. He is now awaiting trial. You would think that he would be praised considering the scale of the attacks on rail guards. They seem to be arresting the wrong people and when they arrest the right people they don’t seem to punish them. Sometimes it’s best not to get involved or you could find yourself seriously injured or dead.

Crime is so bad in this country that it has spread to the schools. Knife attacks on pupils are so common now that parents are buying stab proof uniforms. This is happening a lot in London where there are 170 different gangs for you to watch your back for with many having guns especially those that haven’t reached adulthood. It’s what gun control does to a society.

Instead of trying to arrest the teenage yobs that make peoples lives hell one police force decided that they were going to give their police lessons in skateboarding while another hired teenagers to be PCSOs. Even if teenage yobs are arrested they normally get let off with an ASBO but if they flout an ASBO they won’t be sent to prison so it’s a waste of time. You won’t even be sent to prison for benefit fraud or smoking cannabis in front of your children.

With all the uncontrollable crime going on is it any wonder that nearly half are too afraid to leave their home at night? We might start feeling safe when criminals are actually punished and humiliated like the drug dealer in Ulster who was tarred and feathered by locals. We also think that crime shouldn’t pay.

Eastern Europeans were shown to be dangerous drivers after we found that they were the cause of 15% of fatal road accidents. They were also plundering our fish stocks and poaching swans. Immigrants are even creating entirely new crimes.

There is lots of crime being committed in London and 20% of that crime is committed by foreigners. If we stopped immigration we would see a substantial reduction in crime. Sometimes the police are silly though. If you are willing to travel thousands of miles you aren’t going to go home even if a policeman gives you a map and tells you where the nearest detention centre is.

You would think it would take a long time for immigrants or asylum seekers to commit their first crime in this country but you would be wrong because a group of them weren’t even here for a full day before they started their gang warfare. I think the Swiss nationalists have it right when they say foreign criminals should be deported.

We all know that the government is criminally stupid and before the Eastern Europeans began to pour into this country the government decided that they would estimate the number that would come. They came to the conclusion that only 48,000 would come after they interviewed 169 immigrants. Quite how they came to that conclusion from interviewing that many is unclear. Infact there are so many Poles here that Poland have their own labour shortage. There must be parts of Eastern Europe that are completely empty as there are so many here that the government is refusing to publish the real numbers but there must be a lot considering 25% of births involve a foreign parent.

There are hundreds of thousands of failed asylum seekers in this country. Rather than find them and deport them the government wants to let them stay by giving them an amnesty. Some asylum seekers have already been allowed here and are being given luxury flats by the council.

The number of failed asylum seekers being deported fell this year with the government saying it was because they were going after foreign criminals but a few months ago they said the foreign criminals were no longer a priority.

The government seems to enjoy discriminating against white people. They have done a lot this year but sadly we are only looking at this month because this month they decided that they don’t want white English people applying for certain jobs especially those in the environment agency. When it comes to MI5 they are in a tizzy because there aren’t enough women even though they get better benefits than the men. I think something should be done about that.

The government seem to think that whites are second class citizens and have decided that black teenagers need better role models while white teenagers can get stuffed. If you are a white young adult the government like you even less which is why 20% of them are not in work or education .

There is a reason why 40% of children can’t even do the basics. It’s because of bad education resulting from the fact that some teachers barely passed their own degrees. When it comes to exams, many examiners are concerned because teenagers are writing violent essays.

Dumbing down seems to be happening a lot in education and they are set to dumb it down a bit more by making Shakespeare comic strips which don’t contain the old word styles.

The islamification of this country continues. This time it’s the education system that they are targeting. One primary school decided that it would be a good idea to get their pupils to copy lines of the Muslim prayer for handwriting practice while the government were thinking of making it compulsory for all university students to learn about Islam.

The TV channels started to help the islamication of this country. First the BBC cancelled a casualty episode because it could offend Muslims then ITV decided that they were going to show a documentary about what Muslims think about Jesus.

The Muslims are whining yet again. This time they are whining over Muhammed cartoons published in a Swedish newspaper.

I bet our troops are sure glad they joined the military as they could be holidaying in sunny Afghanistan for another 38 years. Being there so long you might want to pass the time by blogging about how the government treats you like shit. Unfortunately soldiers are banned from blogging so you can’t.

The war on terror isn’t going too well either. As well as a number of setbacks they have also lost 20% of their experienced intelligence officers. Our troops also have substandard military equipment and the Taliban seem to be phoning their wives and training child soldiers.

At first the government wasn’t going to give recognition to our troops serving in Afghanistan but decided it was a good idea to conduct a review into the subject. Perhaps our troops would rather have a pool than a medal? They won’t be given one unlike our foreign office bureaucrats in Afghanistan… but hey, atleast they will get free post.

The Gurkhas are also being treated like shit. After 18 years of service one Gurkha injured himself so badly that he couldn’t be in the army anymore. Instead of being grateful we gave him £100 and basically told him to piss off.

The smoking ban was again in the news with people doing their best to show that they don’t like it. One businessman is openly flouting the law and is probably going to win.

In Lancashire a café has banned non smokers from sitting outside in revenge at the smoking ban. Another lady from Lancashire decided to join the protest and banned the Prime Minister from entering her pub.

While some people were flouting the ban the government decided that they needed someone to punish so the first smoking martyr was to be prosecuted.

Smoking in public places has been banned for a lot longer in Scotland is has caused some unexpected side effects with more people arguing.

There was more than usual health and safety idiocy from around the country. The Health and Safety Executive decided to spend £12,000 of our money on finding out if towels are ok for slipper floors. The tests were inconclusive so they want another £12,000.

The Health and Safety Executive decided to go on a trip to an amusement park to find out how dangerous it is there. They came up with some crap conclusions and spent £110,000 on the project.

You may think that you don’t need any training to climb a ladder but health and safety bureaucrats think otherwise. The police handed control of speed signs to the local council only they didn’t have any trained ladder climbers and the police never had any trained ladder climbing instructors so the speed signs will have to wait.

In real life these health and safety people probably wouldn’t be able to get jobs. Where else would you find an industry where you can get a job looking at gravestones safety or deciding what kind of shorts are appropriate to wear in a pool?

The trainee doctors won’t be having a fun time. Atleast 10,000 It’s weird that the NHS has a £1 billion surplus. The question is if they have the money they should pay for more nurses and cleaners so war heroes won’t die when they contract a superbug. They could also pay for more ambulances so they don’t have to pay bus companies to transport organs for operations.

In an effort to make us recycle more the government is thinking of giving us smaller bins. It’s probably because they want to increase the number of fines they can take from you. The government likes taking money from you which is why they introduced HIPs which could be used to raise your council tax. Sooner or later we might have to build more houses in the countryside seeing as how the countryside has a housing shortage too.

If you are environmentally friendly in Croydon it’s probably best not to be environmentally friendly to save the environment

The government is hoping to close 2,500 post offices and they don’t like opposition to their plans which is why they are bribing and blackmailing post office employees to stay silent. The government like silencing any opposition which is why they are going to abduct a baby when it is born and ban anyone from talking about it. Gordon Brown is also stopping junior doctors from getting better paid jobs and he is trying to silence his own political party.

Our MPs think that they are above us. They think that they have an automatic right to our money. The speaker of the house earns £130,000 per year but that didn’t stop him from spending £3,000 of taxpayers’ money on legal advice. Our government will always want to tax us more so they are sending tax inspectors to foreign countries at our expense to find out ways of taxing us more. One way of taxing us more is using green taxes which people don’t want but the Conservatives don’t know that people don’t want this.

There was lots of wailing and crying over slavery by politicians especially Red Ken who was probably doing it to attract the black vote. He is sucking up to the Poles to get their vote too. John Prescott even called for a slavery Memorial Day while a museum decided to praise black people for ending slavery.

The EU was once again in the news. This time our minister to the UN decided that we should give our UNSC seat to the EU. The EU seems to like having a say in everything. They decided that Poland couldn’t build a road and they stopped Italy selling their gold reserves to pay off a debt. They even tried to get Texas to stop with the death penalty.

If we don’t want to be part of the EU we have no choice. Gordon Brown won’t give us one even though MPs and the unions are pressuring him. The MPs aren’t pressuring him that much though. Some are too cowardly to say anything because it could damage their careers but then again they might like wasting our money on politically correct projects. Why do we have to pay so much money especially when they make up stupid restaurant laws?

The disparities between the English and Scots have become apparent again. The Scots seem to be getting better healthcare than the English while the English pay for it.

The SNP want to give Scotland a referendum on independence while the other parties are totally against the people having a say.

Progress

Problems

During the last 60 years we have been brainwashed to believe we are progressing. These are all lies. I will expose these lies for what they are.

Crime
Decades ago liberals decided to give the scum in jail human rights and stopped capital and corporal punishment. Since then criminals don't fear jail. They don't care if they are caught because now they get playstations and satellite TV while their victims are left with emotional misery.

Teenagers now run rampant and they cannot be stopped but instead of punishing them they are given trips to go on.

If that is progress I want nothing part of it. I want nothing to do with a society that give more rights to the criminal than the victim.


European union
They said that being part of international organisations like the EU was progress yet I don't see anything progressive about it. We spend 9 billion pounds per year on europe which can be spent on hospitals, schools, transport, agriculture, industry and jobs right here.

Wouldn't better hospitals and schools alone be progress?

If the EU is progress I want nothing to do with it. I want nothing to do with a society that gives its national sovereignty away and puts the EU before the education and health needs of the nation. Supporting the EU is treason and I want nothing to do with a treacherous nation.


Immigration and multiculturalism
They say immigration and multiculturalism enrich our society so it is progress. How is this progress? Where are the benefits? I would like to see them. I see no benefits whatsoever in allowing an alien people with alien ways to take over.

Immigration does more harm than good. It is a myth that immigrants will only do the jobs that the natives won't do. It is a fact that immigrants will do the job for less money. Natives would do the job if they weren't paid slave wages. Why should native britons be stopped from working just because they don't want to be slaves?

If immigration is progress I want nothing to do with it. I want nothing to do with a society that makes their people work as slaves or stops them from working altogether if they don't become slaves.

There are very little benefits from immigration. The only benefits that I can see is we get the educated of the third world but even that has consequences. The educated should stay in their home countries to help build them up. Whole parts of africa have no health professionals.

To argue that Britain needs economic migrants because of their alleged energy, talent and skills, is to ignore the flip side of that coin which is that the country they came from is going to be deprived of their energy, talent and skills. Every economic migrant who comes here is depriving his or her country of their ability, and is prolonging their own country's agony. It is irresponsible and immoral to deprive countries in this way. Economic migration on these terms is a form of piracy, which should be outlawed!

If stealing health professionals from the people who desperately need them is progress I want nothing to do with it. I want nothing to do with a society that steals from the poor to help the rich while the poor suffer with diseases and don't have a chance at a proper education.

Some say we need immigrants to keep the health service running and immigrants are progress for the NHS. The only reason nurses from Asia are being imported is because we don't, and won't, pay a living wage to nurses from this country. This is a new form of 21st century slavery.

If keeping health staff as slaves is progress I want nothing to do with it. I want nothing to do with a society that treats their health professionals as slaves.

Some say we need immigrants to pay our pensions but that is wrong. Immigrants age too so we are just delaying the inevitable and making things worse than what they will be.

If delaying the inevitable and only having one solution is progress I want nothing to do with it. I don't want to be part of a society that is just making things worse in the long term.

Some say that companies couldn't survive without immigrants. My answer to that would be So what! If the company is only employing immigrants then what good is it doing for anyone other than immigrants?

If putting foreigners first is progress I want nothing to do with it. I want nothing to do with a society that puts the wellbeing of foreigners above the wellbeing of the citizens.

Why else is immigration bad? Well according to the Optimum population trust the UK's sustainable population level in the 22nd century may be as low as 30 million.

If destroying our society by overpopulation is progress I want nothing to do with it. I want nothing to do with a society that is going to destroy itself.

They said multicuturalism was progress but all it does is breed hate and repression of women. It was the cause of the London attacks and it has been the cause of the antiwhite violence antiwhite violence. In the attempt to stop us from debating the dangers of Islam the government gagged our freedom of speech with the religious hatred law.
If multiculturalism is so good why can't we debate it without fear of arrest? In islam women are separated from men in the mosque. Women are made to wear burquas so their faces cannot be seen. This is repression of women.

If repression and less freedom is progress I want nothing to do with it. I want nothing to do with a society that allows repression and takes away our freedom to debate issues.


Education
They said compulsory education was progress but compulsory schooling is just a part time prison. It destroys individuality and was invented by the rich so they could get the population ready to be employed by them so they wouldn't want anything else. Why should the young be forced to do something they don't want to do? Education should be a choice and not something you have to do.

If repressive forced education is progress I want nothing to do with it. I want nothing to do with a society that locks the youngsters up for hours at a time 5 days per week, punishing them because they aren't intelligent then wondering why they misbehave in class.


Economics
They said that free trade was progress but what good has free trade ever done? Was it good for MG Rover? NO! It is a fact that because of free trade companies are heading to foreign countries because they can make things cheaper and sell it cheaper here which makes people stop buying british goods and putting british people out of business.

If putting foreign workers first is progress I want nothing to do with it. I want nothing to do with a society that doesn't help british companies and british workers.


Health
They said free healthcare for all was progress. I have yet to see it. Free healthcare helps the people who do not deserve it. Free healthcare helps those who continually drink themselves to a liver disorder like George Best.

Treating smoking-related illness costs the NHS £1.7billion a year. Why should we give free healthcare to people who know its harmful to their health? Why should the tax payer be forced to hand out money to care for people who are knowingly killing themselves?

The same with alcohol, it costs the NHS £3 billion per year to help people with alcohol related problems. Why should we help those poisoning themselves? I am not saying that we should ban alcohol and tobacco but we should not help those that are poisoning themselves. If they want to poison themselves and live they should pay for the treatment themself.

If progress is taking money from people with common sense to help those that are continually poisoning themselves I want nothing to do with it. I want nothing to do with a society that penalises healthy people with common sense by taking money from them to help the idiots.


Abortion
They said allowing women to have abortions was progress but how can it be progress when the public are funding the destruction of 180,000 unborn babies per year in britain alone. In 2002 abortions cost the NHS £38.2 million. It cost less the years before according to this table.
If we add them together and estimate that from 2003-2005 abordtion cost the same as 2002 we come to the figure of 183 million. Why should the public have to finance other peoples mistakes?

If financing the destruction of unborn babies is progress I want nothing to do with it. I don't want anything to do with a society that finances the destruction of unborn babies.



The free press
They said freedom of the press was progress but the people who own it continually try to brainwash us from the government (bbc) to private newspapers.

Take Rupert Murdoch. Rupert Murdoch is the owner of News International which owns much of the media in the UK.

What many people don't know about Rupert Murdoch is that he is in the pocket of Tony Blair. Rupert Murdoch has effectively paid no tax in the UK since 1988. Why is this? Well it is the fault of our corrupt governments. During 1988 until before the 1997 election the tory party was in charge and Rupert Murdoch donated money to the tory party and had his newspapers support the tory party so the tory party had no reason to stop him as he was helping them.

Just before the 1997 election he suddenly switched sides to labour and had his newspapers support labour and when the labour party were elected Tony Blair didn't do anything about the tax issue eventhough he meets Rupert Murdoch every 6 months.

Take Vere Harmsworth. Daily Mail and General Trust plc was owned by Vere Harmsworth, third Viscount Rothermere until his death in 1998 and has since passed to his son. Just before his death he had started sitting on the labour benches in the House of Lords. Why should someone who has a political agenda be allowed to sell newspapers when it is obvious that they are going to put a spin on the news?

That is not all but those are only two examples. 90% of the newspapers in britain have some connection to blair or labour from donating money to the labour party so they can break monopoly laws to fancying a member of the labour party. Just look it up. Find the people who own the newspapers newspapers.

If progress is for our government to allow big business to brainwash us because they bribe the government with money and good press then I want nothing to do with that society. I want nothing to do with a society that allows brainwashing.


Unions
They said allowing labour unions was progress but the leadership of those unions are fascists who only represent the interests of the political opinion that they agree with and they expel those that they don't agree with.

Unions also have far too much power. They routinely donate money to political parties (mainly labour) which means that if the labour party do not do what the unions want they can hold money back which the parties need. This means unions can blackmail the party into doing what the union leadership want and not what is best for the country. Its exactly the same with the rich.

If progress is allowing people with money to dictate what should happen then I want nothing to do with it. I want nothing to do with a society that allows money to have more weight than the views of the people that elected them.


Democracy
They said British democracy was progress but we don't have a real democracy. In the last election labour became the government yet were only elected by 36% of the votes. How is this democracy when the minority get to rule over the majority?

If progress is allowing the minority to rule over the majority then I want nothing to do with it. I want nothing to do with a society that doesn't listen to the views of the majority.


Privatisation
They said privatisation of our energy companies (gas, electricity etc) was progress yet I have seen no progress. Companies are only interested in money. They don't care about peoples lives, all they care about is profits. If they cared about peoples lives would they allow between 20,000-50,000 pensioners to die in winter every year because they couldn't heat their homes?

If progress is allowing the elderly to die because they couldn't afford to heat their homes I want nothing to do with it. I want nothing to do with a society that places profits before peoples lives.

They said privatisation of our banks was progress but where is this progress? All I see is people getting loans and paying up to 40% more back. How is that progress? How is it progress when they can almost stop a party from running by banning them from having an account with them? Barclays did this with the BNP and they have just survived. HSBC also did the same yet they are prepared to hold an account belonging to a London based terror group which has close links to al-Qaeda.

If progress is trying to ban a perfectly legal political party but helping terrorism I want nothing to do with it. I want nothing to do with a society that promotes terrorism and hates democracy.


Aid
They said sending aid to third world countries would lead to progress and it hasn't. Aid in the majority of cases does more harm than good. In the year 2000 World Bank aid destroyed the Mozambique cashew and sugar industries. Mostly, though, aid is simply wasted, producing nothing of value for anyone. The developing world is littered with the wreckage of ill-conceived aid projects, such as the salt mine in Uganda financed by the European Union. The site was so isolated, no one would live there and no salt was ever mined.

Now, even some aid recipients are asking for an end to aid. In February, the New York Times Magazine published a fascinating interview with Yousif Kowa, leader of a poor tribe living in the Nuba Mountains of Sudan, possibly the poorest nation on Earth.

Mr. Kowa rejected foreign aid for his people because he said it would destroy their self-reliance. He said he had seen many cases where previously productive farms were destroyed by food aid and did not want to see it happen to his people.
In other cases, the withdrawal of aid has been a blessing.

In May, the Atlantic Monthly reported that Mogadishu, Somalia, has boomed since aid was cut off in 1995, due to the breakdown of civil government. Without governments, both foreign and domestic, mucking things up, local entrepreneurs were able to make things happen without interference. The reporter was forced to conclude that "the lack of large-scale foreign aid might have benefits as well as drawbacks."

Between 1980 and 2002, the World Bank’s International Bank for Reconstruction and Development and International Development Association provided $68.2 billion (in 1995 dollars) in development assistance to the48 countries in sub-Saharan Africa to spur development in the region. This is a huge investment, particularly when the relatively small sizes of the recipient countries’ economies are taken into account. Despite this development investment (often at extremely subsidized interest rates and with generous repayment schedules), sub-Saharan Africa has performed dismally. Of the 45 sub-Saharan African countries for which per capita GDP data are available from 1980 to 2002:

*
Twenty-three experienced negative compound annual growth in real per capita GDP (constant 1995 U.S. dollars);
*
Seven experienced marginal compound annual growth of less than 1 percent in real per capita GDP; and
*
Fifteen experienced compound annual growth of more than 1 percent in real per capita GDP, but only three achieved per capita growth over 4 percent.

In 2001 Britain gave $4.7 billion in foreign aid which should have been spent on our own country. Since 2001 the amount has been increasing. In 2004 it was $7.8 billion. How can our government justify this when it never helps in the long term and in some cases actually harms the country?

If progress is what I talked about above I want nothing to do with it. I want nothing to do with a society that is destroying another society by "helping".


Solutions
Now that I have exposed the lies and shown that we really haven't progressed as much as we think I will attempt to give solutions most of which will be harsh but they are common sense. I will be killing multiculturalism but also embracing it in other ways. You don't think that is possible? oh it is. haha.


Crime
Punishments will get harsher. These punishments will be something that is a benefit from Islam because torture will be involved.

This is what I would change in the law. I would make it so there were 4 levels in crime:

Level 1- Non violent non financial crimes (except not paying fines). These people just go to jail.

Level 2- Violent crimes that don't result in death or it wasn't intended to result in death.

Level 3- Financial crimes

Level 4- Crimes that result in death or were supposed to result in death or sex crimes.


This would be the punishments:


Level 1-Community service or a couple of months in jail with 1 day per week of hard labour. Will never receive torture

Level 2-

First offence-Jailtime with 2 days of hard labour for first offence

Second offence-Jailtime with 3 days of hard labour. Judge can punish with 1 day of torture per week but not reccommended.

Third offence-Jailtime with 3 days hard labour. Judge must punish with 1 day of torture per week.

Fourth offence-Jailtime with 3 days hard labour with 2 days torture or death penalty.

Fifth offence-Death penalty

Level 3-
First offence-Jailtime with 3 days of hard labour. Judge can punish with 1 day of torture per week but not reccommended.

Second offence-Jailtime with 3 days hard labour. Judge must punish with 1 day of torture per week.

Third offence-Jailtime with 3 days hard labour with 2 days torture or death penalty.

Fourth-Death penalty


Level 4-
First offence-3 days of hard labour and 3 days of torture

Second offence-Death penalty


Torture will start 25% of the way through the sentence or 1 year into it. Whichever comes first.


Also the sentence given will just be a minimum amount. When sentence is up the criminal will head to a panel to see if they should be released. If criminal has done anything wrong while in jail they will stay in longer. Every one month after that they will head to the panel again to see if they should be released. If they are still considered a danger or the panel thinks they will do the crime again then they will not be allowed out.
Also if they stole property and the police never recovered it they will stay in jail until they tell the police where it is.


When it is their second offense they will have the option to have their citizenship revoked and be sent to a foreign country as long as they promise not to return as long as they have served 50% of their sentence.


The poorest 50 nations will be asked to take them. For every person they take they will get 300 pounds. They can do what they like with the prisoners as it will be of no concern to us what they do with scum. When they go they can only take clothes. All their financial belonging will belong to the state to compensate the victim and pay the 300 pounds to the third world country.

We should also allow law abiding citizens above the age of 30 (by that time if they were going to commit a crime they would have probably already done it) to carry guns as long as they have a license. If they are threatened by thugs or have their house burgled they should be allowed to shoot to kill.



European union
Get out of the EU. Britain has the fourth largest economy in the world and only trading with the 17 countries in the EU is not going to advance our economy. We should get out of the EU so we can trade with the world and stop them from dictating laws to us. 80% of our laws come from the EU and our government have to pass them even if they could be stupid like stopping barmaids from showing cleavage because they could possibly get skin cancer.

We have never needed the EU and it is time for our corrupt and treacherous politicians to realise that.


Immigration
Immigration has to be stopped. We must have the military patrolling our boarders at all times. Get our soldiers from iraq, germany, afghanistan and other foreign places were they are stationed. If that still isn't enough to adequately protect our boarders we should start the draft again making people from the age of 18 join up for 18 months.

If we catch immigrants and we don't know where they have come from (maybe they ripped up their passport) we will just do what we did with the criminals, send them to one of the poor countries that will take them possibly putting them in an even worse situation.

There should also be a boarder patrol police that goes around business and checks if the workers are illegal immigrants. If they are then the illegal will be deported within 72 hours and the business will be fined upto 10,000 pounds per illegal immigrant. Also for every 1 illegal found in that year the government will get 1% of the profits for a whole year.


Multiculturalism
Multiculturalism will be abolished and this is how:

Religion will technically be nationalised (lol) and this is how:

All religious figures (vicars, imams etc) will be employed by the government and need to get a license every year to preach.

In Turkey the Turkish government make up the sermons for the mosques and the imams have to read them. The imams are not allowed to do their own sermons. This is what we will do. A ministry of religion will be created and sermons for each of the major religions will be made every week.

If the religious figures make their own sermon then they will lose their right to preach and will lose their license and be replaced.

All sermons must be done in english.

Burquas will be banned in all public places.

Places of worship will be classed as public places.

The muslims "call to prayer" will be banned if more than 50% of the population of that town are none muslims.

Religious people who protest freedom of speech will be deported (sikhs rioting at that sikh play).

No more places of worship will be allowed to be built

In muslim countries they have a thing called dhimmitude and we will embrace that over here (embracing multiculturalism here). Dhimmitude is the oppression of none muslims. In saudi arabia it is made so none muslims pay more taxes which help muslim projects. In pakistan it is made so if a church is burned down it cannot be rebuilt. There are many more restrictions here. Therefore we will embrace dhimmitude on them by:

1. Stopping anymore religious buildings being built except for churches.
2. Banning the display of non christian symbols on the outside of their existing houses of worship.
3. Banning the publishing or selling of non-Muslim religious literature.

Embracing dhimmitude will be embracing multiculturalism more than we do now. So whoever likes multiculturalism should like dhimmitude as it is from another culture and it may "enrich" us.



Education

1. During primary and secondary school we should learn about our culture only. Our poets snd authors will be learned about in english. Our history and culture will be learned about in history. Christianity will be learned about in religious education. Our country will be learned about in geography for the majority of time (we don't have volcanoes). Our artists will be learned about in art. Our musicians will be learned about in music. If yoiu want to learn about other cultures and countries you will have a chance in college.

2. Education will not be compulsory from the age of 12. From then on you will have to sign up every year. If the child doesn't sign up their parents will lose child benefit for them.

3. Conspiracy theories will be taught in schools. They will not be taught if it it is the truth or not. This will make them think better.

4. School will be made more fun. See whyhere



Economics
Its time to stop free trade. We should put tariffs on all foreign goods that we are able to make in this country. As for telephone workers being offshored to India and other countries they should also be banned.

It is obvious to anyone even with half a brain that free trade is bad for the country.

If there is a shortage of jobs in the country the government should make jobs. If there is a lot of people skilled in manufacturing the government should start plants up and start selling products in britain and foreign countries making very little profit in britain but a normal profit selling in foreign countries. That way the government can employ people and get profits.

The same can be done for the people with no skills. The government can open supermarkets if ther is a lack of any. This will employ supermarket workers, lorry drivers and factory workers. The prices could be low enough that the poor can buy the products. This way big businesses won't have power over anyone because if they leave the government will just create jobs.


Health
Healthcare should be free but only to the people who attempt to keep themselves healthy. Not one penny of the tax payers money should go to help people who harm themselves. This will show we have zero tolerance for people like this and if they want good health the burden starts with them. This might make people cut down on cigarretes and alcohol and make the populace healthier by making them take care of themself.

Also just like the dentistry people will have to have a medical checkup every 6 months. If they don't take the advice of a doctor then they should start paying for medical treatment themself. It has already been shown in the problem section of this piece that we would save billions of pounds doing this.

We would still help those who smoke, become obese and drink alot. We will pay for gym sessions and anti addiction sessions.


Abortion
Eventhough abortion destroys 180,000 foetuses per year we should not ban it. Instead we should keep it legalised but make the mother pay for her abortion. Not one penny of tax payers money should go to pay for other peoples mistakes. If you want an abortion that is fine but don't expect the tax payer to foot the bill.


The press
It is time for newspapers and news channels to be nationalised. How would we do this? We would ban individual citizens from owning newspapers and news channels.
We would then nationalise the news so the government own it however they will not control it because the populace will elect an editor once per year. If the editor has an agenda the populace can then fire them after 1 year. The same should be done for news channels.

There would be a national editor for the national newspapers and regional editors dealing with regional news.

This will get control of information away from the rich and elite who just want to impose their agenda onto us. Also think of the environment. One type of newspaper=less paper needed=less trees cut down=better environment.

Incase the news doesn't tell us what is really happening the rich and elite can still own newspapers however they can only bring them out once per month and they can only own one newspaper.

People will be saying that a free press is what shows we are a democratic society. Can it get anymore free if the people control the news?



Unions and big business
Its time unions started doing things for the workers and using the money that they get from their workers to actually do something for the union and not donate to political parties. Unions have no business getting involved in politics which is why they should be banned from donating money to political parties. This would stop political parties doing what is beneficial for the unions and not what is beneficial for the people.

To stop political parties doing things for big business and the rich and not for the populace they will only be able to donate a maximum of £25,000 per year to political parties.


Democracy
At the moment we should keep british democracy mostly the same as it is and change it a little. It should be made so that if the winning party gets less than 50% of the vote they can only get in some of their policies freely. The rest have to be put into an election 1 by 1. So seeing as labour only got 36% of the vote in the last election they would only be able to get 36% of their policies through. The rest will have to be voted on by the populace.

Incase of something bad happening to the country the government will still be able to start emergency legislation to deal with the problem without getting the populace to vote on it.

This would allow for more and better democracy.


Privatisation
We should nationalise our water, electricity and gas companies. The resources of the people should not be in the hands of individuals. At the moment these companies make a lot of money from high prices. The government should make a small profit from it so the populace can have cheap energy and so that those 20,000-50,000 pensioners that die each year won't have to die from the cold.

As for banks they should also be nationalised and because multiculturalism is supposed to be beneficial we will have sharia law style bank accounts which will mean that people won't have to pay much interest on their loans.


Aid
I have already proven that aid is not beneficial, a lie that liberals continue to spew. Seeing as it is beneficial for none of us they will get limited aid and they will have to do something in return to get it like be part of our criminal and immigration policies (see above for more info).


Conclusion
I am sure if we did these changes we would have a more progressive society and we would have less taxes as we wouldn't be spending as much. I estimate atleast £10 billion would be saved. Which mean we would roughly each save £166 on our taxes.


I have finished now. Do you feel the same way as me? if so come and join my site if not why not debate at my site? I will have a kind of blog and forums.

Join here

If you don't already have an acornrack account you will have to sign up here first.